11 Oct 2022
 | 11 Oct 2022

The Wetland Intrinsic Potential tool: Mapping wetland intrinsic potential through machine learning of multi-scale remote sensing proxies of wetland indicators

Meghan Halabisky, Dan Miller, Anthony J. Stewart, Daniel Lorigan, Tate Brasel, and L. Monika Moskal

Abstract. Accurate, un-biased wetland inventories are critical to monitor and protect wetlands from future harm or land conversion. However, most wetland inventories are constructed through manual image interpretation or automated classification of multi-band imagery and are biased towards wetlands that are easy to detect directly in aerial and satellite imagery. Wetlands that are obscured by forest canopy, occur ephemerally, and those without visible standing water are, therefore, often missing from wetland maps. To aid in detection of these cryptic wetlands, we developed the Wetland Intrinsic Potential tool, based on a wetland indicator framework commonly used on the ground to detect wetlands through the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydrology, and hydric soils. Our tool uses a random forest model with spatially explicit input variables that represent all three wetland indicators, including novel multi-scale topographic indicators that represent the processes that drive wetland formation, to derive a map of wetland probability. With the ability to include multi-scale topographic indicators, the WIP tool can identify areas conducive to wetland formation and provides a flexible approach that can be adapted to diverse landscapes. For a study area in the Hoh River Basin in Western Washington, USA, classification of the output probability with a threshold of 0.5 provided an overall accuracy of 91.97 %. Compared to the National Wetland Inventory, the classified WIP-tool output increased areas classified as wetland by 160 % and reduced errors of omission from 47.5 % to 14.1 %, but increased errors of commission from 1.9 % to 10.5 %. The WIP tool is implemented using a combination of R and python scripts in ArcGIS.

Meghan Halabisky et al.

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-665', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Feb 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-665', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Feb 2023

Meghan Halabisky et al.

Data sets

WIP training and validation data and input datasets Meghan Halabisky, Dan Miller, Anthony Stewart

Model code and software

WIP tool code Dan Miller , Meghan Halabisky , Anthony J. Stewart , Daniel Lorigan , Tate Brasel

Meghan Halabisky et al.


Total article views: 660 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
343 305 12 660 17 16
  • HTML: 343
  • PDF: 305
  • XML: 12
  • Total: 660
  • BibTeX: 17
  • EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Oct 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Oct 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 656 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 656 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
Latest update: 26 Mar 2023
Short summary
Accurate wetland inventories are critical to monitor and protect wetlands. However, in many areas a large proportion of wetlands are unmapped because they are hard to detect in aerial and satellite imagery. We developed a machine learning approach using spatially mapped variables of wetland indicators (i.e., vegetation, hydrology, soils) to predict wetland probability across a landscape. Our tool provides a flexible approach that can be adapted to diverse landscapes to improve wetland detection.