Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-650
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-650
 
06 Sep 2022
06 Sep 2022
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Comparative water-use by fast-growing E. grandis x E. nitens clonal hybrid and Pinus elliottii near the Two Streams Research Catchment, South Africa

Nkosinathi David Kaptein1, Alistair David Clulow1,2, Michele Lynn Toucher2,3, Colin S. Everson2,6, Steven Brian Dovey4, and Ilaria Germishuizen5 Nkosinathi David Kaptein et al.
  • 1Discipline of Agrometeorology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 3209, South Africa
  • 2Centre for Water Resources Research, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 3209, South Africa
  • 3Grasslands-Forests-Wetlands Node, South African Environmental Observation Network, Pietermaritzburg, 3201, South Africa
  • 4Shaw Research Institute, Sappi Forests, Howick, 3290, South Africa
  • 5Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, Scottsville, 3201, South Africa
  • 6Department Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract. Pine plantations are the dominant specie currently planted within the South African commercial forestry industry. Improvements in bioeconomy markets for dissolving wood pulp products have seen an expansion in fast-growing Eucalyptus plantations due to their higher productivity rates and better pulping properties than pine. This has raised concerns regarding the expansion of Eucalyptus plantations and how they will affect water resources as they have been reported to have higher transpiration (T) and total evaporation rates (ET) than pine. We compared T (mm), diameter at breast height (DBH, cm) and leaf area index (LAI) of an eight-year-old Eucalyptus grandis x Eucalyptus nitens clonal hybrid (GN) with twenty-year-old Pinus elliottii. Transpiration was measured for two consecutive seasons (2019’ 20 and 2020’ 21) using a heat ratio sap-flow method. The ET was calculated using published values of soil evaporation and rainfall canopy interception to quantify the impact of each species on water resources. In 2019’ 20 season, annual T for P. elliottii exceeded GN by 28 %, while 2020’ 21 season showed no significant differences. This was associated with 17 and 21 % greater LAI for P. elliottii than GN in 2019’ 20 and 2020’ 21 season, respectively. Dq increments were statistically similar (p > 0.05) in 2019’ 20 season, whereas the 2020’ 21 season produced significant differences (p < 0.05). Transpiration for P. elliottii showed a strong (R2 > 0.70) linear relationship with solar radiation, LAI and shallow soil matric potential, while GN had a good (R2 > 0.70) relationship with solar radiation only. The soil water potential was very low at the GN site, indicating that the site was water stressed, with trees competing for water as soon as it becomes available to sustain T, causing a rapid soil water depletion after rainfall, while P. elliottii used water more gradually. P. elliottii estimated ET was 18 % greater than GN in 2019’ 2020, with no significant differences in 2020’ 21 season. Results from this study indicated that on water limited sites, T and ET between GN and P. elliottii may not be different, however, in subtropical regions, GN T and ET have the potential to exceed P. elliottii, causing soil water depletion. Long-term total soil water balance studies in the same region would be beneficial to understand the impact of long-term commercial forestry on water resources.

Nkosinathi David Kaptein et al.

Status: open (until 01 Nov 2022)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-650', Jacob Crous, 16 Sep 2022 reply
    • AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Nkosinathi Kaptein, 02 Oct 2022 reply

Nkosinathi David Kaptein et al.

Nkosinathi David Kaptein et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 202 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
150 43 9 202 3 4
  • HTML: 150
  • PDF: 43
  • XML: 9
  • Total: 202
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Sep 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Sep 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 195 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 195 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Oct 2022
Download
Short summary
Comparative water use studies between pine versus Eucalyptus and the potential impact on water resources are very few globally. This study used internationally recognized methods to quantify the impact of each specie on water resources and the results showed that pine uses more water than Eucalyptus, however, the Eucalyptus study site was water stressed. A conclusion was that on water limited sites, impact on water resources could be negligible, whereas in subtropical regions could be severe.