Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-62
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-62
 
25 Mar 2022
25 Mar 2022

Control of crustal strength, tectonic inheritance and extrusion/indentation rates on crustal deformation and basin reactivation: insights from laboratory models

Benjamin Guillaume1, Guido M. Gianni2,3, Jean-Jacques Kermarrec1, and Khaled Bock1 Benjamin Guillaume et al.
  • 1University of Rennes, CNRS, Géosciences Rennes, UMR 6118, Rennes, France
  • 2Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
  • 3Instituto Geofísico Sismológico Ing. Fernando Volponi (IGSV), Universidad Nacional de San Juan. San Juan, Argentina

Abstract. Geological settings characterized by the simultaneous action of multiple tectonic regimes provide a unique opportunity to understand complex interactions among different geodynamic processes. From an experimental point of view, these contexts remain comparatively less studied than areas with more simple patterns of deformation resulting from primary plate-boundary interactions. Here, we carried out analog experiments involving simultaneous shortening and orthogonal extension under different rheological conditions, and including the effect of crustal inheritance. We performed brittle experiments and brittle-ductile experiments to simulate cases of “strong” and “weak” crusts, respectively. We present two types of experiments: i) one stage experiments with either shortening-only or synchronous orthogonal shortening and stretching, and ii) two stages experiments with a first phase of stretching and a second phase with either shortening-only or synchronous orthogonal shortening and stretching. In our models, deformation occurs by a combination of normal, thrust, and strike-slip faults with structures location depending on boundary conditions and crustal inheritance. For brittle models, we show that the three types of structures can develop at the same time for intermediate ratios of extrusion over indentation rates (1.4 <  Ve/Vs < 2). For brittle-ductile models, we observe either shortening-orthogonal thrust faults associated with conjugate strike-slip faults (mod- els with low Ve/Vs and no initial extensional phase) or stretching-orthogonal normal faults associated with conjugate strike-slip faults (models with high Ve/Vs and initial extensional phase). Whatever the crustal strength, the past deformation history, and the extrusion/indentation ratio, both normal and thrust faults remain with similar orientations, i.e. stretching-orthogonal and shortening-orthogonal, respectively. Instead, strike-slip faults exhibit variable orientations with respect to the indentation direction, which may be indicative of the strength of the crust and/or of the extrusion/indentation ratio. We also show that extensional structures formed during a first stage of deformation are never inverted under orthogonal shortening but can be reactivated as normal or strike-slip faults depending on Ve/Vs. The models replicate some deformation patterns documented in nature. Independently of the crustal rheology or the presence of crustal weaknesses, conjugate strike-slips faults develop along with variable normal faulting during compression/indentation, reminiscent of tectonic escape processes along the Himalayas-Alpine chain.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

02 Sep 2022
Control of crustal strength, tectonic inheritance, and stretching/ shortening rates on crustal deformation and basin reactivation: insights from laboratory models
Benjamin Guillaume, Guido M. Gianni, Jean-Jacques Kermarrec, and Khaled Bock
Solid Earth, 13, 1393–1414, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1393-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1393-2022, 2022
Short summary

Benjamin Guillaume et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-62', Nemanja Krstekanic, 22 Apr 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Benjamin Guillaume, 06 Jun 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-62', Marco Bonini, 24 Apr 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Benjamin Guillaume, 06 Jun 2022
  • EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-62', Ernst Willingshofer, 08 Jun 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-62', Nemanja Krstekanic, 22 Apr 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Benjamin Guillaume, 06 Jun 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-62', Marco Bonini, 24 Apr 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Benjamin Guillaume, 06 Jun 2022
  • EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-62', Ernst Willingshofer, 08 Jun 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Benjamin Guillaume on behalf of the Authors (05 Jul 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (07 Jul 2022) by Ernst Willingshofer
AR by Benjamin Guillaume on behalf of the Authors (08 Jul 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (12 Jul 2022) by Ernst Willingshofer
ED: Publish as is (12 Jul 2022) by Susanne Buiter(Executive Editor)

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

02 Sep 2022
Control of crustal strength, tectonic inheritance, and stretching/ shortening rates on crustal deformation and basin reactivation: insights from laboratory models
Benjamin Guillaume, Guido M. Gianni, Jean-Jacques Kermarrec, and Khaled Bock
Solid Earth, 13, 1393–1414, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1393-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1393-2022, 2022
Short summary

Benjamin Guillaume et al.

Benjamin Guillaume et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 510 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
358 130 22 510 37 6 7
  • HTML: 358
  • PDF: 130
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 510
  • Supplement: 37
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Mar 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 468 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 468 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Sep 2022
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Under tectonic forces, the upper part of the crust can break along different types of faults, depending on the orientation of the applied stresses. We show, using scaled analogue models, that the relative magnitude of compressional and extensional forces as well as the presence of inherited structures resulting from previous stages of deformation control the location and type of faults. Our results gives insights into the tectonic evolution of areas showing complex patterns of deformation.