Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-310
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-310
11 May 2022
 | 11 May 2022

Modelling wintertime Arctic Haze and sea-spray aerosols

Eleftherios Ioannidis, Kathy S. Law, Jean-Christophe Raut, Louis Marelle, Tatsuo Onishi, Rachel M. Kirpes, Lucia Upchurch, Andreas Massling, Henrik Skov, Patricia K. Quinn, and Kerri A. Pratt

Abstract. Anthropogenic and natural emissions contribute to enhanced concentrations of aerosols, so-called Arctic Haze in the Arctic winter and early spring. Models still have difficulties reproducing available observations. Whilst most attention has focused on the contribution of anthropogenic aerosols, there has been less focus on natural components such as sea-spray aerosols (SSA), including sea-salt sulphate and marine organics, which can make an important contribution to fine and coarse mode aerosols, particularly in coastal areas. Models tend to underestimate sub-micron and overestimate super-micron SSA in polar regions, including in the Arctic region. Quasi-hemispheric runs of the Weather Research Forecast model, coupled with chemistry model (WRF-Chem) are compared to aerosol composition data at remote Arctic sites to evaluate the model performance simulating wintertime Arctic Haze. Results show that the model overestimates sea-salt (sodium and chloride) and nitrate and underestimates sulphate aerosols. Inclusion of more recent wind-speed and sea-surface temperature dependencies for sea-salt emissions, as well as inclusion of marine organic and sea-salt sulphate aerosol emissions leads to better agreement with the observations during wintertime. The model captures better the contribution of SSA to total mass for different aerosol modes, ranging from 20–93 % in the observations. The sensitivity of modelled SSA to processes influencing SSA production are examined in regional runs over northern Alaska (United States) where the model underestimates episodes of high SSA, particularly in the sub-micron, that were observed in winter 2014 during field campaigns at the Barrow Observatory, Utqiaġvik. A local source of marine organics is also included following previous studies showing evidence for an important contribution from marine emissions. Model results show relatively small sensitivity to aerosol dry removal with more sensitivity (improved biases) to using a higher wind speed dependence based on sub-micron data reported from an Arctic cruise. Sea-ice fraction, including sources from open leads, is shown to be a more important factor controlling modelled super-micron SSA than sub-micron SSA. The findings of this study support analysis of the field campaign data pointing out that open leads are the primary source of SSA, including marine organic aerosols during wintertime at the Barrow Observatory, Utqiaġvik. Nevertheless, episodes of high observed SSA are still underestimated by the model at this site, possibly due to missing sources such as SSA production from breaking waves. An analysis of the observations and model results does not suggest an influence from blowing snow and frost flowers to SSA during the period of interest. Reasons for the high concentrations of sub-micron SSA observed at this site, higher than other Arctic sites, require further investigation.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

22 May 2023
Modelling wintertime sea-spray aerosols under Arctic haze conditions
Eleftherios Ioannidis, Kathy S. Law, Jean-Christophe Raut, Louis Marelle, Tatsuo Onishi, Rachel M. Kirpes, Lucia M. Upchurch, Thomas Tuch, Alfred Wiedensohler, Andreas Massling, Henrik Skov, Patricia K. Quinn, and Kerri A. Pratt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5641–5678, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5641-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5641-2023, 2023
Short summary

Eleftherios Ioannidis et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Review of egusphere-2022-310', Øystein Hov, 23 Jun 2022
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-310', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Aug 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-310', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Aug 2022
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-310', Eleftherios Ioannidis, 17 Dec 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Review of egusphere-2022-310', Øystein Hov, 23 Jun 2022
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-310', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Aug 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-310', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Aug 2022
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-310', Eleftherios Ioannidis, 17 Dec 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Eleftherios Ioannidis on behalf of the Authors (03 Jan 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (13 Jan 2023) by Radovan Krejci
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (02 Feb 2023)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (03 Feb 2023)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (15 Feb 2023) by Radovan Krejci
AR by Eleftherios Ioannidis on behalf of the Authors (10 Mar 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (20 Mar 2023) by Radovan Krejci
AR by Eleftherios Ioannidis on behalf of the Authors (01 Apr 2023)  Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

22 May 2023
Modelling wintertime sea-spray aerosols under Arctic haze conditions
Eleftherios Ioannidis, Kathy S. Law, Jean-Christophe Raut, Louis Marelle, Tatsuo Onishi, Rachel M. Kirpes, Lucia M. Upchurch, Thomas Tuch, Alfred Wiedensohler, Andreas Massling, Henrik Skov, Patricia K. Quinn, and Kerri A. Pratt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5641–5678, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5641-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5641-2023, 2023
Short summary

Eleftherios Ioannidis et al.

Eleftherios Ioannidis et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 915 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
673 229 13 915 12 9
  • HTML: 673
  • PDF: 229
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 915
  • BibTeX: 12
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 May 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 May 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 862 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 862 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Dec 2023
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Enhanced concentrations of aerosols influence the Arctic region during wintertime and winter-spring transition, transported from mid-latitude source regions. However, there are also local anthropogenic and natural (sea-spray aerosols – SSA) sources. SSA are a major contributor to PM1.0/PM10 at remote coastal sites during wintertime, however, models tend to miss essential mechanisms for SSA production and local sources of marine organics in the Arctic. This study addresses these uncertainties.