Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-218
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-218
 
16 May 2022
16 May 2022

The ozone–climate penalty over South America and Africa by 2100

Flossie Brown1, Gerd A. Folberth2, Stephen Sitch3, Susanne Bauer4,5, Marijin Bauters6, Pascal Boeckx6, Alexander W. Cheesman3,7, Makoto Deushi8, Inês Dos Santos6, Corinne Galy-Lacaux9, James Haywood1,2, James Keeble10,11, Lina M. Mercado2,12, Fiona M. O'Connor2, Naga Oshima8, Kostas Tsigaridis4,5, and Hans Verbeeck6 Flossie Brown et al.
  • 1College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • 2College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • 3UK Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
  • 4Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
  • 5NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA
  • 6Department of Environment, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • 7Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, James Cook University, Australia
  • 8Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
  • 9Laboratoire d’Aerologie, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, CNRS, Toulouse, France
  • 10Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  • 11National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), University of Cambridge, UK
  • 12UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK

Abstract. Climate change has the potential to increase surface ozone (O3) concentrations, known as the ‘ozone–climate penalty’, through changes to atmospheric chemistry, transport and dry deposition. In the tropics, the response of surface O3 to changing climate is relatively understudied, but has important consequences for air pollution, human and ecosystem health. In this study, we evaluate the change in surface O3 due to climate change over South America and Africa using 3 state-of-the-art Earth system models that follow the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 3 7.0 emissions scenario from CMIP6. To quantify the changes driven by climate change alone, we evaluate the difference between end of the century predictions for simulations which include climate change and simulations with the same emissions scenario but with a fixed present-day climate. We find that by 2100, models predict an ozone–climate penalty in areas where O3 is already predicted to be high due to the impacts of precursor emissions, namely urban and biomass burning areas, although on average models predict a decrease in surface O3 due to climate change. We identify a small but robust positive trend in annual mean surface O3 over polluted areas. Additionally, during biomass burning seasons, seasonal mean O3 concentrations increase by 15 ppb (model range 12 to 18 ppb) in areas with substantial biomass burning such as the arc of deforestation in the Amazon. The ozone–climate penalty in polluted areas is shown to be driven by an increased rate of O3 chemical production, which is strongly influenced by NOx concentrations and is therefore specific to the emissions pathway chosen. Multiple linear regression finds the change in NOx concentration to be a strong predictor of the change in O3 production whereas increased isoprene emission rate is positively correlated with increased O3 destruction, suggesting NOx-limited conditions over the majority of tropical Africa and South America. However, models disagree on the role of climate change in remote, low-NOx regions, partly because of significant differences in NOx concentrations produced by each model. We also find that the magnitude and location of the ozone–climate penalty in the Congo basin has greater inter-model variation than in the Amazon, so further model development and validation is needed to constrain the response in central Africa. We conclude that if the climate were to change according to the emissions scenario used here, models predict that forested areas in biomass burning locations and urban populations will be at increasing risk of high O3 exposure.

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

21 Sep 2022
The ozone–climate penalty over South America and Africa by 2100
Flossie Brown, Gerd A. Folberth, Stephen Sitch, Susanne Bauer, Marijn Bauters, Pascal Boeckx, Alexander W. Cheesman, Makoto Deushi, Inês Dos Santos Vieira, Corinne Galy-Lacaux, James Haywood, James Keeble, Lina M. Mercado, Fiona M. O'Connor, Naga Oshima, Kostas Tsigaridis, and Hans Verbeeck
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12331–12352, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12331-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12331-2022, 2022
Short summary

Flossie Brown et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-218', William Collins, 08 Jun 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-218', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Jun 2022
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-218', Flossie Brown, 17 Aug 2022
  • AC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-218 (correction to AC1)', Flossie Brown, 22 Aug 2022

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-218', William Collins, 08 Jun 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-218', Anonymous Referee #2, 29 Jun 2022
  • AC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-218', Flossie Brown, 17 Aug 2022
  • AC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2022-218 (correction to AC1)', Flossie Brown, 22 Aug 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Flossie Brown on behalf of the Authors (23 Aug 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (23 Aug 2022) by Jeffrey Geddes
AR by Flossie Brown on behalf of the Authors (31 Aug 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (01 Sep 2022) by Jeffrey Geddes

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

21 Sep 2022
The ozone–climate penalty over South America and Africa by 2100
Flossie Brown, Gerd A. Folberth, Stephen Sitch, Susanne Bauer, Marijn Bauters, Pascal Boeckx, Alexander W. Cheesman, Makoto Deushi, Inês Dos Santos Vieira, Corinne Galy-Lacaux, James Haywood, James Keeble, Lina M. Mercado, Fiona M. O'Connor, Naga Oshima, Kostas Tsigaridis, and Hans Verbeeck
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12331–12352, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12331-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12331-2022, 2022
Short summary

Flossie Brown et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 884 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
719 152 13 884 74 8 12
  • HTML: 719
  • PDF: 152
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 884
  • Supplement: 74
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 12
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 May 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 May 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 816 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 816 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 21 Sep 2022
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
Surface ozone can decrease plant productivity and impair human health. In this study, we evaluate the change in surface ozone due to climate change over South America and Africa using Earth system models. We find that if the climate were to change according to the worst-case scenario used here, models predict that forested areas in biomass burning locations and urban populations will be at increasing risk of ozone exposure, but other areas will experience a climate benefit.