the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Livestock grazing, plant community and abiotic factors shape blue carbon stocks in Nordic coastal marshes
Abstract. Coastal marshes are key habitats contributing to organic carbon (OC) storage but remain understudied in Nordic regions regarding Blue Carbon processes. This study quantified OC stocks in above- and below-ground biomass and in the top 50 cm-soil across 12 grazed and ungrazed marshes, spanning major environmental gradients, and assessed how biotic (plant communities, livestock grazing) and abiotic (soil properties, environmental conditions) drivers shape OC storage. Grazing and environmental gradients strongly structured plant communities, partly by regulating the reed Phragmites australis, prevalent in ungrazed sites. Aboveground OC stocks were reduced by grazing, both directly through biomass removal and indirectly by reducing reed dominance. Belowground OC stocks were driven by plant community composition and indirectly by grazing effects on vegetation. Root biomass was concentrated in the top 15 cm in grazed sites and deeper (15–50 cm) in ungrazed sites, reflecting contrasting plant strategies. Abiotic soil properties were major large-scale drivers of soil OC storage, while grazing affected soil OC storage indirectly through plant composition. Soil OC stocks accounted for ∼73 % of total OC in grazed sites and ∼63 % in ungrazed ones and was higher in grazed sites (99.7 ± 57.9 Mg ha⁻¹) than in ungrazed sites (78.2 ± 44.2 Mg ha⁻¹). Soil OC increased with finer textures, whereas vegetation and grazing effects were variable and locally expressed. Overall, soil OC stocks in Nordic coastal marshes fall within the lower range of global estimates. These findings highlight the need to consider soil processes, grazing and environmental gradients tin the sustainable management of Nordic coastal marshes and their carbon storage potential.
- Preprint
(1582 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(623 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 15 May 2026)
- CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-991', Heli Jutila, 24 Mar 2026 reply
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-991', Nezha Mejjad, 20 Apr 2026
reply
General Comments
The study provides valuable insights into understudied Nordic Blue Carbon processes. However, certain methodological choices regarding soil acidification require further justification, and the flow of the results could be improved for better clarity.
Abstract
Structure and Flow: I suggest restructuring lines 21–27 to first present the calculated carbon stocks, followed by the biotic and abiotic factors that influenced them. This "results-first" approach allows the reader to grasp the magnitude of the findings before examining into the drivers.
Methods
Quantification Formulas: Please include the specific equations used to calculate the aboveground, belowground, and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks to ensure full transparency.
Acidification Protocol: The authors report using 1.2 N HCl to remove carbonates, citing Kennedy et al. (2005). This concentration is relatively high; typical salt marsh protocols often favor more dilute solutions (e.g., 1–4% or ~0.1–0.5 N) to minimize the risk of hydrolyzing or leaching labile organic carbon.
Please clarify if this concentration was an intentional adaptation and provide a justification for its use over more dilute alternatives. Also provide additional details on the acidification procedure, including the volume of acid added, total reaction time, and drying protocols.
Discussion & Analysis
Grazer Specificity: Does the specific type of livestock (e.g., sheep vs. cattle) impact carbon storage differently? I suggest the authors expand on whether there is a known relationship between grazer identity, specific plant traits (beyond just Phragmites reduction), and the ecosystem's overall carbon capture capacity.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-991-RC1
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 134 | 49 | 11 | 194 | 25 | 14 | 9 |
- HTML: 134
- PDF: 49
- XML: 11
- Total: 194
- Supplement: 25
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
These findings highlight the need to consider soil processes, grazing and environmental gradients tin the sustainable management of Nordic coastal marshes and their carbon storage potential.
I wonder whether this last sentence of abstract has an error with extra t and shoulde be as follows
These findings highlight the need to consider soil processes, grazing and environmental gradients in the sustainable management of Nordic coastal marshes and their carbon storage potential.