Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-980
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-980
23 Mar 2026
 | 23 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

Long-term storage of air-dried samples compromises water-extractable organic carbon as a soil health indicator

Swarnali Mahmood, Franky Celestin, Diego Arruda Huggins de Sá Leitão, Ryan E. Champiny, Xinlin Wang, JoAnn B. Donald, Audrey Plauche, S. Carolina Córdova, Christine D. Sprunger, Gabriel Maltais-Landry, and Yang Lin

Abstract. The assessment of soil health relies on sensitive indicators to detect management-induced changes, yet the analytical reliability of these indicators following long-term storage is rarely assessed. We investigated how multi-year storage of air-dried samples influenced the concentrations of several common soil health indicators, including water-extractable organic carbon and nitrogen (WEOC, WEN), mineralizable carbon (Cmin), and permanganate-oxidizable carbon (POX-C), using archived samples from a cover crop experiment. Concentrations of WEOC nearly doubled after three years of storage, while WEN decreased by 19%. A small but significant 6% increase in Cmin concentration was also observed. In contrast, POX-C concentrations remained stable, indicating robustness to storage effects. These storage effects were consistent among three treatments with different cover crop species. In addition, WEOC concentrations consistently declined over time in this experiment and four long-term agricultural sites in the USA, but bulk soil organic carbon (SOC) or soil organic matter (SOM) did not. These results suggest that multi-year storage of air-dried samples inflates the WEOC pool. Therefore, we caution the use of WEOC as a soil health indicator in archived samples, as the observed variations might reflect storage artifacts rather than genuine management impacts.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Swarnali Mahmood, Franky Celestin, Diego Arruda Huggins de Sá Leitão, Ryan E. Champiny, Xinlin Wang, JoAnn B. Donald, Audrey Plauche, S. Carolina Córdova, Christine D. Sprunger, Gabriel Maltais-Landry, and Yang Lin

Status: open (until 04 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Swarnali Mahmood, Franky Celestin, Diego Arruda Huggins de Sá Leitão, Ryan E. Champiny, Xinlin Wang, JoAnn B. Donald, Audrey Plauche, S. Carolina Córdova, Christine D. Sprunger, Gabriel Maltais-Landry, and Yang Lin
Swarnali Mahmood, Franky Celestin, Diego Arruda Huggins de Sá Leitão, Ryan E. Champiny, Xinlin Wang, JoAnn B. Donald, Audrey Plauche, S. Carolina Córdova, Christine D. Sprunger, Gabriel Maltais-Landry, and Yang Lin

Viewed

Total article views: 41 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
31 9 1 41 6 2 1
  • HTML: 31
  • PDF: 9
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 41
  • Supplement: 6
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Mar 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Mar 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 41 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 41 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Soil health tests often use sensitive indicators, but their reliability after long-term storage is unclear. Using air-dried archived soils from a cover crop experiment, we found that three years of storage nearly doubled water-extractable organic carbon. Similar water-extractable organic carbon patterns across different long-term agricultural experiment sites show that storage can distort results, so archived samples should be interpreted with caution.
Share