Mineralogical composition of transported desert dust over Cabo Verde and comparison with model predictions
Abstract. The mineralogical and chemical composition of desert dust particles strongly influences their cloud-forming ability and radiative effects. This study provides quantitative estimates of the main mineralogical and elemental components of desert dust during atmospheric transport above Cabo Verde based on in-situ measurements from the ASKOS campaign in summer 2022, obtained using impactors mounted on unmanned aerial vehicles. Simulations from the METAL-WRF model were used for comparison with sun-photometer observations of total dust load and with in-situ measurements of relative elemental mass fractions of key elements. Across all cases, particle chemical signatures were dominated by illite/muscovite (62%), followed by smectite (9%), kaolinite (9%), quartz (7%), feldspar (5%), calcite (4%), gypsum (3%), and Fe-oxide/Fe-hydroxide (1%). Trajectory and source–receptor analyses combined with satellite observations revealed enhanced calcite fractions for air-masses originating from northern Mali, whereas air masses from southern Mali exhibited increased proportions of Fe-oxide/hydroxide. Good agreement was found between METAL-WRF-derived total dust mass concentrations and independent AERONET observations (slope = 0.62, r = 0.87). Based on in-situ measurements, Si was the dominant elemental component (~25%), followed by Al (~12%), Fe (~6%), Ca (~2.7%), and S (~0.4%). While METAL-WRF reproduced the mean relative abundances of Fe and Ca over the 20-day period, it did not capture the case-to-case variability. Nevertheless, Fe exhibited good agreement, within overlapping uncertainty, between modelled and measured values for most cases, which is particularly relevant for studies of ocean biogeochemistry and dust-related radiative processes.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.