Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-879
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-879
27 Feb 2026
 | 27 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Longitudinal Nitrate Dynamics in a Large Agricultural Watershed Inferred from δ15N, δ18O, 36Cl/Cl, 87Sr/86Sr, and Geochemical Tracers

W.M. Srilani Wickramasinghe, Marty Dale Frisbee, James J. Camberato, Sylvie M. Brouder, Greg M. Michalski, and Mark R. Williams

Abstract. Nitrogen (N) dynamics in large agricultural, mixed land-use watersheds are rarely investigated. These dynamics are complex due to spatially variable nitrogen sources such as fertilizers, manure, and effluent from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Here, we investigate the longitudinal trends in N sources and processes along the Wabash River, Indiana, USA (watershed area 85,340 km2) using δ15N and δ18ONO3, 36Cl/Cl, 87Sr/86Sr, and solute concentrations measured from the headwaters to the river mouth. Results show considerable variation in δ15N and δ18ONO3 with increasing distance from the headwaters, while variations in NO3- concentration are only present in the Upper Wabash River. Source apportionment using δ15N and δ18ONO3 identifies manure and septic waste as the dominant source of N in the headwaters and at specific locations downstream supported by the presence of poultry and swine farms and WWTPs near the river. A clear denitrification trend is indicated by a strong correlation between δ15N and δ18O (R2 = 0.9, p = 0.0001) with an O:N fractionation ratio (slope) of 0.7. We infer that denitrification occurs in the river or subsurface rather than in fields or riparian zones. Denitrification is likely obscuring the fertilizer contribution since the δ15N data are not similar to fertilizers; however, 36Cl/Cl ratios point to an old source of Cl- such as potash fertilizers. These results show that N dynamics in large agricultural watersheds are complex illustrating the spatial variability in N loading and denitrification processes between the headwaters and river mouth, and that additional studies at large watershed scales are warranted.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
W.M. Srilani Wickramasinghe, Marty Dale Frisbee, James J. Camberato, Sylvie M. Brouder, Greg M. Michalski, and Mark R. Williams

Status: open (until 10 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
W.M. Srilani Wickramasinghe, Marty Dale Frisbee, James J. Camberato, Sylvie M. Brouder, Greg M. Michalski, and Mark R. Williams
W.M. Srilani Wickramasinghe, Marty Dale Frisbee, James J. Camberato, Sylvie M. Brouder, Greg M. Michalski, and Mark R. Williams

Viewed

Total article views: 35 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
27 6 2 35 2 2
  • HTML: 27
  • PDF: 6
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 35
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 23 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 23 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
Longitudinal river samples collected in the Wabash River (85,340 km2) show complex nitrate dynamics. δ15N data show septic waste and manure as sources of nitrate while δ15N fingerprint of fertilizers have been obscured by denitrification. The net export of nitrate is smaller than what would be accumulated without denitrification. Chlorine-36 captures an old source of Cl- such as potash supporting a fertilizer source. Denitrification likely occurs either in the channel or groundwater.
Share