Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-877
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-877
22 Jun 2026
 | 22 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Solid Earth (SE).

Global controls on aftershock productivity: roles of magnitude and tectonic setting

Antonino D'Alessandro

Abstract. Aftershock productivity varies substantially among large earthquakes, yet the relative roles of magnitude, tectonic environment, and source properties remain incompletely resolved at the global scale. Here we perform a comprehensive, data-driven analysis of aftershock productivity for all Mw ≥ 7.0 mainshocks worldwide since 1976, using a homogeneous workflow based on USGS/NEIC catalogs, PB2002 plate-boundary geometries, and uniformly defined aftershock windows (r ≤ 200 km, t ≤ 30 days, M ≥ 4.5). Mainshock events are classified into three tectonic domains—subduction, other plate boundaries, and intraplate/crustal—allowing systematic comparison of productivity patterns across geodynamic settings. Across all tectonic classes, aftershock productivity scales linearly with mainshock magnitude in log-space, with nearly identical slopes (b ≈ 0.76–0.81), indicating a universal magnitude-controlled triggering mechanism. In contrast, intercepts differ significantly among tectonic environments: subduction earthquakes are systematically the most productive, followed by other plate-boundary events and intraplate earthquakes. Depth and distance to the nearest plate boundary exert weaker but physically interpretable secondary influences, with productivity decreasing for deeper ruptures and for intraplate events located far from plate boundaries. Residual analysis and multivariate correlations confirm that magnitude and tectonic setting explain the dominant share of global variability, whereas depth and distance provide secondary, context-dependent modulation. Together, these results establish the first unified, physically interpretable global framework of aftershock productivity, quantifying both universal magnitude-driven scaling and environment-specific productivity offsets. The findings provide actionable constraints for global ETAS parameterization, operational aftershock forecasting, and seismic-hazard models for future great earthquakes.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Antonino D'Alessandro

Status: open (until 03 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Antonino D'Alessandro
Antonino D'Alessandro
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 22 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Large earthquakes are often followed by many smaller shocks, but the number of these events varies widely. We analyzed nearly fifty years of global earthquake records to understand why. We found that the size of the main earthquake is the strongest factor controlling how many aftershocks occur. Earthquakes along subduction zones tend to produce more aftershocks than those within continents. Depth and distance from plate boundaries have weaker effects.
Share