Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-872
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-872
26 Feb 2026
 | 26 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

On the reliability of seasonal snow forecasts

Ekaterina Vorobeva, Yvan Orsolini, Patricia de Rosnay, Jonathan Day, Retish Senan, Damien Decremer, and Frederic Vitart

Abstract. Reliable information on seasonal snow conditions is important for long-range weather forecasting and climate modeling. The reliability of winter-mean hindcasts of snow water equivalent (SWE) produced by the ECMWF for the period 1993–2022 within the CopERnIcus climate change Service Evolution (CERISE) project is evaluated in this study. In probabilistic forecasting, reliability for a binary event is defined as the consistency between forecast probabilities and observed frequencies. Here, reliability is assessed using two independent SWE datasets (ERA5-Land and ESA Snow-CCI v4) across eight land regions in the Northern Hemisphere excluding mountainous regions. The reliability assessment is performed for two tercile-based binary events representing low- and high snow accumulation winters. Reliability is quantified using a weighted linear regression applied to reliability diagrams and is grouped into five categories from perfect to dangerous. The results show good reliability of the ECMWF seasonal snow hindcasts for both low- and high-snow conditions. The assessment shows sensitivity to the choice of verification dataset, with ERA5-Land yielding slightly higher reliability categories than ESA Snow-CCI. It is found that differences in hindcasts reliability between regions and between verification datasets may be linked to snow variability, model representation, and observational uncertainty.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ekaterina Vorobeva, Yvan Orsolini, Patricia de Rosnay, Jonathan Day, Retish Senan, Damien Decremer, and Frederic Vitart

Status: open (until 09 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ekaterina Vorobeva, Yvan Orsolini, Patricia de Rosnay, Jonathan Day, Retish Senan, Damien Decremer, and Frederic Vitart
Ekaterina Vorobeva, Yvan Orsolini, Patricia de Rosnay, Jonathan Day, Retish Senan, Damien Decremer, and Frederic Vitart
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 26 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
How reliable are probabilistic seasonal snow forecasts in winter? Although they are routinely issued by operational prediction centres such as ECMWF, their reliability has never been evaluated. We close this gap by analyzing 30 years of seasonal snow re-forecasts from ECMWF and evaluating them against two snow datasets. Our results provide comprehensive assessment of seasonal snow forecast reliability and offer new insights into their performance in different parts of the Northern Hemisphere.
Share