Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-861
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-861
27 Feb 2026
 | 27 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Comprehensive Inter-comparison of Generative AI Models for Super-Resolution Precipitation Downscaling Across Hydroclimatic Regimes

Shivam Singh, Simon Michael Papalexiou, Hebatallah M. Abdelmoaty, Tom Hartvigsen, and Antonios Mamalakis

Abstract. High-resolution precipitation information is essential for hydrologic modeling, flood forecasting, and climate-risk assessment, yet global weather and climate models operate at spatial resolutions too coarse to resolve storm structure, intermittency, and extremes. Deep-learning-based statistical downscaling provides a computationally efficient alternative to dynamical downscaling, but deterministic convolutional neural networks often yield overly smooth predictions and underestimate fine-scale variability and extreme events. Generative deep-learning models, including generative adversarial networks and diffusion models, offer a promising alternative by enabling stochastic downscaling and explicit representation of uncertainty. This study presents a systematic, hydrologically oriented comparison of three representative deep-learning frameworks for precipitation super-resolution: a convolutional U-NET, a conditional Wasserstein GAN (WGAN), and a conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM). Using a perfect-model experimental design based on ERA5-Land precipitation over distinct hydroclimatic regions of the United States, we evaluate performance under 8-times (8×) and 16-times (16×) downscaling tasks within a unified training and evaluation framework. Models are evaluated using diagnostics that examine precipitation distributions, wet–dry occurrence, extremes, spatial structure, storm morphology, mass consistency, ensemble variability, and computational cost. All three models preserve aggregate rainfall mass despite the absence of explicit physical constraints. Differences arise primarily at fine spatial scales and in the representation of extremes, spatial dependence, and uncertainty. U-NET provides stable and computationally efficient predictions but smooths small-scale variability. WGAN improves fine-scale structure and heavy-tail behavior at the expense of increased noise. The DDPM yields physically coherent ensemble members and an explicit representation of uncertainty, at a substantially higher computational cost.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Shivam Singh, Simon Michael Papalexiou, Hebatallah M. Abdelmoaty, Tom Hartvigsen, and Antonios Mamalakis

Status: open (until 24 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Shivam Singh, Simon Michael Papalexiou, Hebatallah M. Abdelmoaty, Tom Hartvigsen, and Antonios Mamalakis
Shivam Singh, Simon Michael Papalexiou, Hebatallah M. Abdelmoaty, Tom Hartvigsen, and Antonios Mamalakis

Viewed

Total article views: 32 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
23 7 2 32 2 2 2
  • HTML: 23
  • PDF: 7
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 32
  • Supplement: 2
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Feb 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 23 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 23 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
High-resolution precipitation is essential for hydrologic and climate-risk applications, but climate models are too coarse to resolve storm-scale structure and extremes. We compare a deterministic U-NET and two generative models (WGAN and diffusion) for 8× and 16× precipitation downscaling using ERA5-Land. All models conserve rainfall mass, but differ at fine scales: U-NET is stable yet smooths extremes, while generative models better capture variability and heavy tails with added uncertainty.
Share