the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
China Regional 3 km Downscaling Based on Residual Corrective Diffusion Model
Abstract. A fundamental challenge in numerical weather prediction (NWP) is efficiently producing high-resolution forecasts. A widely adopted solution is to downscale coarser global model outputs. This study focuses on statistical downscaling, which uses historical data to learn mappings between low- and high-resolution meteorological fields. Deep learning has become a key tool for this, enabling powerful super-resolution models like diffusion models and Generative Adversarial Networks for downscaling applications. Herein, we leverage CorrDiff, a diffusion-based downscaling framework, with three key enhancements relative to its original implementation. First, the study domain is expanded to nearly 40 times the spatial extent of the original version. Second, the scope of target downscaling variables is extended beyond surface variables to incorporate upper-air variables across six pressure levels. Third, a global residual connection is integrated to further boost prediction accuracy. To produce 3 km resolution forecasts for the China region, the trained CorrDiff model is applied to 25 km global grid forecasts derived from two sources: a conventional global NWP model and a deep learning-based weather model developed using Spherical Fourier Neural Operators. The China Meteorological Administration Mesoscale Model (CMA-MESO) is selected as the baseline for comparative evaluation. Experimental results demonstrate that the downscaled forecasts generated by our framework outperform the direct forecasts of CMA-MESO for almost all target variables, as quantified by the Mean Absolute Error metric. Specifically, forecasts of radar composite reflectivity reveal that CorrDiff, as a generative model, is capable of capturing fine-grained meteorological details, yielding more physically realistic predictions than deterministic regression-based downscaling models.
- Preprint
(12822 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 09 May 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-822', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Mar 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-822/egusphere-2026-822-RC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-822-RC1 -
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-822', Juan Antonio Añel, 26 Mar 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it is unclear if it does comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
For the work that you present, you use ERA5 and the 3 km resolution China regional reanalysis data. However, the Zenodo repositories that you have provided do not seem to contain the used data.Â
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, if the repositories that you have provided do not contain all the code and data used to perform the work presented, publish them in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy. Â
The 'Code and Data Availability’ section must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.Â
I must note that if you do not reply to this comment addressing the mentioned issue, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive EditorCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-822-CEC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Honglu Sun, 27 Mar 2026
reply
Dear Editor,
Thank you very much for your careful check and clear guidance regarding compliance with the GMD Code and Data Policy. We highly appreciate your reminder and have addressed the issue as follows.
Following your request, we have added two days of sample data (including ERA5 and the 3km resolution China regional reanalysis dataset, CMA RRA). The new Zenodo repository is: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19244294.
We would like to clarify two important constraints regarding the full dataset:
1.   The complete 3km CMA RRA reanalysis dataset (2010–2024) is not yet publicly available under current data management regulations. As stated in the relevant reference, access prior to official release requires application to the CMA Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre (CEMC).
2. Â Â The full dataset is extremely large: a single time step of the processed data occupies nearly 380 MB, making archiving the entire dataset in public repositories impractical at this stage.
To fully support peer review and reproducibility, we have provided two days of representative sample data in the Zenodo repository for reviewers to test and validate our code and workflow. Upon request from editors or reviewers, we can promptly provide additional data (up to two weeks) via secure, confidential transmission.
The revised code and data availability section reads as follows:
The model code and some sample data are available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19244294 Sun (2026). The ERA5 data are publicly available from the Climate Data Store (CDS). The 3km resolution China regional reanalysis data are not yet publicly available under current data management regulations. As stated in Xu et al. (2026), access prior to official release requires application to the CMA Earth System Modeling and Prediction Centre (CEMC).The manuscript's list of references now includes the following entries (the second is a new addition):
(1) Sun, H.: Downscaling model based on CorrDiff, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19244294, 2026(2) Xu, Z. F., J. L. Wang, L. P. Jiang, et al., 2026: CMA regional re-analysis (CMA-RRA): A 3-km resolution, 1-h cycling analysis for China. J. Meteor. Res., 40(x), 1–20,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-026-5285-4.
We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused by these data access constraints and greatly appreciate your understanding and flexibility. We are happy to provide further materials or clarifications at any time to meet the journal’s requirements.
Sincerely,
Honglu SunCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-822-AC1 -
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 27 Mar 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Many thanks for the detailed reply, and your efforts to comply with the policy of the journal. We can consider the current version of your manuscript in compliance with the code policy of the journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-822-CEC2
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 27 Mar 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Honglu Sun, 27 Mar 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | 141 | 16 | 357 | 11 | 26 |
- HTML: 200
- PDF: 141
- XML: 16
- Total: 357
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 26
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1