Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-819
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-819
11 Mar 2026
 | 11 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf).

Sediment storage and routing in bedrock canyons

Chloe B. A. Ross, Julia C. Carr, Jeff E. Larimer, Max Hurson, Leonard S. Sklar, Morgan Wright, Nick Viner, and Jeremy G. Venditti

Abstract. Bedrock river bathymetry is dynamic, with incision rates dependent on sediment cover, supply, and mobility in the channel. However, the scale and fluctuation of this dynamic sediment storage is not well understood, particularly in large bedrock rivers where the bed is not visible at low flows. We used repeat, high resolution, multibeam bathymetric surveys from 2021–2023 to characterize bed and bank topography in nine bedrock canyons that are representative of a wide range of width, depth, slope, and velocity observed through the 375 km long Fraser Canyon in British Columbia. Change in elevation as high as 15 m is identified between surveys. We characterize patches of contiguous change to measure changes in sediment storage volume. Our observations reveal that channel morphology determines where storage occurs. We find that sediment is 'staged' through canyons, initially being deposited in a canyon near a sediment supply site, then moving downstream as the initial deposit declines. Substantial changes in storage volume occur without substantial changes in patch footprint. These findings provide key context for interpreting the reach-scale structure of bedrock erosion, the long-term evolution of mountain river networks, and the moderation of sediment delivery to lowland environments.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Chloe B. A. Ross, Julia C. Carr, Jeff E. Larimer, Max Hurson, Leonard S. Sklar, Morgan Wright, Nick Viner, and Jeremy G. Venditti

Status: open (until 24 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Chloe B. A. Ross, Julia C. Carr, Jeff E. Larimer, Max Hurson, Leonard S. Sklar, Morgan Wright, Nick Viner, and Jeremy G. Venditti
Chloe B. A. Ross, Julia C. Carr, Jeff E. Larimer, Max Hurson, Leonard S. Sklar, Morgan Wright, Nick Viner, and Jeremy G. Venditti

Viewed

Total article views: 252 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
147 89 16 252 30 11 19
  • HTML: 147
  • PDF: 89
  • XML: 16
  • Total: 252
  • Supplement: 30
  • BibTeX: 11
  • EndNote: 19
Views and downloads (calculated since 11 Mar 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 11 Mar 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 215 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 215 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Sediment cover in bedrock rivers can protect or expose bedrock to incision, yet little is known about sediment storage dynamics in deep canyons since it is difficult to observe the bed. We use repeat bed surveys to identify changes in storage, observing vertical changes up to 15 m. Local flow and channel shape determine where storage occurs, yet storage can vary plenty over a single footprint. The location and timing of sediment inputs to the river influence whether storage is gained or lost.
Share