Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-815
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-815
23 Feb 2026
 | 23 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).

The Dual Effect of Urban Areas on Supercell Storms

Francesco De Martin, Christopher Rozoff, Andrea Zonato, Stefano Alessandrini, and Silvana Di Sabatino

Abstract. The effect of urban land use on convective storms with deep and persistent rotating updrafts (supercell storms) is systematically investigated using ensembles of idealized numerical simulations. A supercell is simulated over a flat domain containing a circular city surrounded by croplands. It is triggered upstream of the city so that it subsequently moves into the urban area. Twenty-five experiments with eleven ensemble members each are conducted in which city size, urban fraction, building height, and building density are varied. The results show a statistically significant weakening of the supercell with increasing city size. A similar trend is observed when varying building density and urban fraction, although these effects are not statistically significant lower than zero. The weakening of the approaching storm is primarily driven by the urban dry island (UDI), which substantially reduces convective available potential energy. While the initial storm can be suppressed by the city, the urban heat island (UHI) generates a pressure minimum that can trigger a new supercell downwind of the city. Compared with UHI-induced vertical velocities, the building-generated vertical velocities are negligible. This study provides a benchmark that expands our understanding of the complex interactions between the urban environment and deep moist convection, emphasizing the role of the UHI and UDI in influencing storm dynamics and highlighting the potential dual effects of urban land use on supercell storms.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Francesco De Martin, Christopher Rozoff, Andrea Zonato, Stefano Alessandrini, and Silvana Di Sabatino

Status: open (until 06 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Francesco De Martin, Christopher Rozoff, Andrea Zonato, Stefano Alessandrini, and Silvana Di Sabatino
Francesco De Martin, Christopher Rozoff, Andrea Zonato, Stefano Alessandrini, and Silvana Di Sabatino

Viewed

Total article views: 50 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
31 19 0 50 0 0 0
  • HTML: 31
  • PDF: 19
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 50
  • Supplement: 0
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Feb 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Feb 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 52 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 52 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
Most convective storm losses occur in urban areas, raising the question of whether cities can intensify severe storms, such as supercells. We found that cities can weaken an approaching supercell by reducing low-level moisture, but can also trigger a new one downwind. More urban vegetation reduces city effects on storm evolution, while building height has little impact. This conceptual model improves understanding of supercell–city interactions and supports advances in early warning systems.
Share