Implementation of the reduced complexity model InMAP at urban scale using a high-resolution WRF-Chem simulation
Abstract. Most of the population globally lives in areas exceeding prior and current WHO guidelines for fine particulate matter (PM2.5), highlighting the persisting need for implementing emission reduction strategies. Given the complex transport and transformation processes that airborne species undergo in the atmosphere, chemical transport models can aid in designing and prioritizing air pollution mitigation actions. However, detailed chemical transport models often require substantial computational power and expertise. For that reason, reduced complexity models have emerged as an alternative, incorporating some of the information from chemical transport models while drastically reducing the technical complexity and computational demand. In this work, we build a local implementation of the Intervention Model For Air Pollution, InMAP, at high spatial resolution for a large urban area, in Bogotá, Colombia. As input for the reduced complexity model, we carried out a detailed 12-month simulation with the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) version 4.1. To achieve sufficiently high spatial-resolution for urban air quality, the model was configured with three nested domains of 27x27 km, 9x9 km, and 3x3 km respectively. When compared with surface station data, the modeled annual mean PM2.5 showed a +3.3 % overestimation at the city-scale. Furthermore, the WRF-Chem simulation accurately captured the structure of the observed PM2.5 time series at daily, weekly and seasonal time-scales. The InMAP base fields showed a slight under-prediction relative to WRF-Chem, but overall, the correlation between the WRF-Chem and InMAP modeled PM2.5 fields was high, with R2 = 0.92. InMAP sensitivity was tested for three emission reduction scenarios of varying complexity, by comparing the marginal concentrations against simulations with the full chemical transport model. The scenarios ranged in complexity, from primary-PM reductions only, to scenarios exploring moderate and severe city-wide emissions reductions from diesel powered mobile sources. Although InMAP marginal PM2.5 fields were linearly correlated with the corresponding WRF-Chem sensitivities, a strong overestimation in predicted PM2.5 variations were shown for all emission reduction scenarios considered. For the simpler scenarios where only primary PM was reduced InMAP sensitivity was a factor of 2 that of WRF-Chem, while for the more complex emission reduction scenarios involving also reduction in gas-phase emissions, InMAP overestimated PM2.5 concentrations by a factor of 5. The driver in InMAPs overestimated PM2.5 sensitivity in the scenarios involving gas-phase precursors was a large overestimation of secondary organic aerosols and particulate nitrate. The results of this work suggest that InMAP can be used to scan for potential emission reduction scenarios at the urban-scale, specially when those scenarios involve mostly primary PM emission reductions. However, our analysis indicates that studies aiming to carry out assessments using the absolute reductions in concentration from InMAP should first calibrate its sensitivities against a full chemical transport model run.
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
First, your manuscript does not contain a Code Availability section, which is mandatory for manuscripts submitted to our journal. I am, but this is something unacceptable, forbidden by our policy, and your manuscript should have never been accepted for Discussions given such violation of the policy. Our policy clearly states that all the code and data necessary to replicate a manuscript must be published openly and freely to anyone before submission. In this regard you need to provide a repository containing the WRF-Chem model and the InMAP model and the local implementation that you have developed.
In addition, you have archived the data used and produced in your work in datahub.uniandes.edu.co/ ; however, such site does not fulfil GMD’s requirements for a persistent data archive because:
- It does not appear to have a published policy for data preservation over many years or decades (some flexibility exists over the precise length of preservation, but the policy must exist).
- It does not appear to have a published mechanism for preventing authors from unilaterally removing material. Archives must have a policy which makes removal of materials only possible in exceptional circumstances and subject to an independent curatorial decision,
If we have missed a published policy which does in fact address this matter satisfactorily, please post a response linking to it. If you have any questions about this issue, please post them in a reply.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Therefore, we are granting you a short time to solve this situation. Please, publish your code and data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
The 'Code and Data Availability’ section must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor