Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-779
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-779
25 Mar 2026
 | 25 Mar 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Using high frequency observations of δ13C-CH4 and δ2H-CH4 and uncertain regional isotopic signatures to estimate sources of UK methane emissions

Alice Emily Ramsden, Anita Ganesan, Matthew Rigby, Chris Rennick, Tim Arnold, Emmal Safi, Edward Chung, Dafina Kikaj, Cameron Yeo, Dave Lowry, Pete Levy, Simon O'Doherty, Kieran Stanley, Dickon Young, Joe Pitt, Damien Martin, Morgan Lopez, Michel Ramonet, Grant Forster, Arnoud Frumau, and Alistair Manning

Abstract. Methane is emitted from a range of anthropogenic and natural sources, and identifying these sources is important for emissions monitoring and mitigation. Different sources emit methane with different isotopic signatures; however these signatures are often uncertain or vary spatially or temporally. Top-down inverse models can be used with measurement of methane mole fractions to estimate total emissions of methane from all sources. We present an inverse model for estimating regional fossil-fuel (FF) and non-fossil-fuel (non-FF) emissions concurrently, using isotope ratio observations and uncertain isotopic signatures. This method is highly adaptable and could be used to estimate emissions from any number of sources. Synthetic data tests with this method show that this model can accurately estimate FF and non-FF methane emissions across the UK, when isotopic source signatures are fixed at known values. However, emissions estimation becomes less accurate when source signature uncertainties rise above approximately 50 % of their likely ranges. In a real-world test of this method, we estimated south-east UK FF and non-FF emissions using high-frequency δ13C-CH4 and δ2H-CH4 observations from one UK site, with source signature uncertainties reflecting our current understanding of these values. Results show a limited impact on emissions uncertainty or magnitude, when compared with output from an inversion using only mole fraction observations. This suggests that both the ongoing expansion of isotope ratio observations and an improved understanding of isotopic signatures is required for this method to be used to estimate UK FF and non-FF methane emissions, with reduced uncertainty compared to traditional inverse methods.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Alice Emily Ramsden, Anita Ganesan, Matthew Rigby, Chris Rennick, Tim Arnold, Emmal Safi, Edward Chung, Dafina Kikaj, Cameron Yeo, Dave Lowry, Pete Levy, Simon O'Doherty, Kieran Stanley, Dickon Young, Joe Pitt, Damien Martin, Morgan Lopez, Michel Ramonet, Grant Forster, Arnoud Frumau, and Alistair Manning

Status: open (until 06 May 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Alice Emily Ramsden, Anita Ganesan, Matthew Rigby, Chris Rennick, Tim Arnold, Emmal Safi, Edward Chung, Dafina Kikaj, Cameron Yeo, Dave Lowry, Pete Levy, Simon O'Doherty, Kieran Stanley, Dickon Young, Joe Pitt, Damien Martin, Morgan Lopez, Michel Ramonet, Grant Forster, Arnoud Frumau, and Alistair Manning

Data sets

Methane mole fraction data for Mace Head, Weybourne, Tacolneston, Bilsdale, Ridge Hill and Heathfield ICOS RI, F. Apadula et al. https://doi.org/10.18160/46ST-DEVK

Measurements of methane isotope ratio from HFD C. Rennick et al. https://hdl.handle.net/11676/MRHwmQFqm0O_Y39065JsIQLS

NOAA MHD flask measurements of δ13C-CH4 NOAA GML https://gml.noaa.gov/aftp/data/trace_gases/ch4c13/flask/surface/

Meteorological data used to drive the transport model from the UK Met Office operational Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Unified Model (UM) Met Office http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/78f23c539d304591b137cf986b69a525

EDGAR - Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research v8.0 M. Crippa et al. https://doi.org/10.2760/953322

Model code and software

multiple_gas_inverse_model v1.0 A. Ramsden https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18496508

Alice Emily Ramsden, Anita Ganesan, Matthew Rigby, Chris Rennick, Tim Arnold, Emmal Safi, Edward Chung, Dafina Kikaj, Cameron Yeo, Dave Lowry, Pete Levy, Simon O'Doherty, Kieran Stanley, Dickon Young, Joe Pitt, Damien Martin, Morgan Lopez, Michel Ramonet, Grant Forster, Arnoud Frumau, and Alistair Manning
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 25 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
Methane is emitted from a range of anthropogenic and natural sources, each with a characteristic isotope ratio signature. We present a method for estimating emissions from multiple sources using isotopic signatures and observations of atmospheric methane isotope ratios. We show the importance of considering isotopic signature uncertainty and demonstrate how our current understanding of these signatures may be limiting this method’s ability to reduce uncertainties in emissions estimates.
Share