Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-756
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-756
12 Feb 2026
 | 12 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

An argument for parsimony in differentiable hydrologic models

Sandeep Poudel and Scott Steinschneider

Abstract. Differentiable hydrologic models that use machine learning to infer parameters for process-based models show promise for both prediction and inference. However, these models are often developed with time-varying parameters, despite evidence that such flexibility can undermine physical consistency and yield only marginal predictive improvements over simpler static approaches. In this study, we revisit the comparison between static and dynamic differentiable models across 531 CAMELS-US basins, evaluating key architectural choices: (1) neural network type (multi-layer perceptron (MLP) vs. long short-term memory network (LSTM)); (2) process model configuration (single- versus ensemble-parameter estimation); and (3) comprehensive versus alternative input feature sets. Using the Hydrologiska Byråns Vattenbalansavdelning (HBV) conceptual model, we find that ensemble parameterizations consistently outperform single-parameter configurations, and that static, MLP-based ensembles achieve performance comparable to dynamic, LSTM-based ensembles despite their simpler structure. Additionally, we find that LSTM-estimated parameters rarely exhibit meaningful temporal variability despite their time-varying inputs, and when they do, this temporal variability may reflect hydrologic model equifinality rather than process dynamics. We further show that models using only latitude and longitude as static inputs achieve spatial generalization comparable to models using comprehensive feature sets describing climate, topography, geology, soils, and land cover. Similarly, temporal generalization is retained even when comprehensive features are replaced with physically meaningless values. This indicates static inputs are primarily used as spatial proxies to generalize in space and for site memorization when generalizing in time, rather than representations of physical basin processes. Overall, our results support reduced complexity in differentiable hydrologic modeling to provide greater transparency while retaining predictive performance.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sandeep Poudel and Scott Steinschneider

Status: open (until 26 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sandeep Poudel and Scott Steinschneider
Sandeep Poudel and Scott Steinschneider
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 12 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary

Hydrological models combining physics with AI are becoming popular for predicting river flow, but are often unnecessarily complex. We tested these models across US river basins and found three key results: simpler designs perform equally well, extensive input data adds little value, and time-varying parameters do not represent actual physical processes. These results challenge assumptions that complexity improves predictions or understanding, arguing instead for simpler hybrid model development.

Share