Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6840
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6840
12 Nov 2026
 | 12 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Reconstructing catchment precipitation with deep learning and a large network of streamflow gauges

Min Wang and Haiyang Shi

Abstract. Global precipitation estimates are uncertain, particularly in sparsely gauged forested areas and mountainous terrain. Improving precipitation estimates in such regions is important for studies of the global water cycle. Previous studies in individual catchments have demonstrated the potential of inferring precipitation from streamflow. Using the Multi-Attribute Catchment Hydrometeorological (MACH) dataset, we shared the parameters of an entity-aware long short-term memory network (EA-LSTM) across catchments and used local weather and streamflow records to reconstruct daily areal precipitation for 906 catchments in the conterminous United States. Each reconstruction used observations through seven days after the target date, with no daily precipitation input. The reference precipitation and weather variables came from Daymet. With runoff included, adding relative humidity, vapour pressure deficit and downward shortwave radiation to temperature improved daily Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) in 895 catchments and raised its median from 0.626 to 0.771. Median KGE reached 0.834 and 0.845 for three- and five-day totals. The median fraction of reference events with a correctly identified peak date was 73.3 %. Median amount bias on reference heavy days was −32.0 %, indicating that the magnitude of extreme precipitation remains more difficult to reconstruct. Grouped by the relative size of the two surface-flow components, median exact peak-date success was 73.8 % in infiltration-excess catchments and 67.5 % in saturation-excess catchments. The median paired gain from adding runoff was 1.9 and 4.5 percentage points, respectively. These results show that learning across catchments can recover multi-day precipitation totals from streamflow and weather records. Future research could improve transfer across catchments and the representation of extreme precipitation amounts.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Min Wang and Haiyang Shi

Status: open (until 24 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Min Wang and Haiyang Shi
Min Wang and Haiyang Shi
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 12 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
Stream gauges record the response of an entire catchment to rain. Across 906 US catchments, river and weather records reconstructed three- to five-day precipitation totals more accurately than daily amounts. They also identified the wettest day in about three quarters of storms at a typical site. The catchments where river flow added most to peak dating differed from those where peak dates were easiest to recover.
Share