Contrasting effects of river and erosion-derived inputs on Arctic Ocean acidification

Abstract. Although the Arctic Ocean is relatively small in volume, its extensive coastline delivers large quantities of terrigenous material from rivers and coastal erosion. As a result, the Arctic Ocean is impacted more strongly by terrigenous material than most other parts of the global ocean. Yet the effect of this material on carbon cycling and ocean acidification remains poorly quantified. In this study, we use an ocean biogeochemical model driven by observation-based estimates of terrigenous carbon, alkalinity, and nutrients to evaluate their contribution to the mean state, depth pattern, and seasonal cycle of ocean acidification, as measured by the aragonite saturation state. Riverine alkalinity generally mitigates acidification, whereas organic carbon from coastal erosion intensifies it. Nutrients from both sources mitigate ocean acidification at the surface by stimulating primary production, but intensify it at depth through subsequent remineralisation. Together, riverine and erosion-derived inputs account for about 20–40 % of the seasonal variability in the saturation state of the surface ocean. This amplification of the natural seasonal cycle is primarily caused by an increase in the summertime maximum of the saturation state. Terrigenous inputs also reduce the Arctic Ocean's capacity to absorb atmospheric CO₂ by 17–25 %. Accurately representing carbon and nutrient inputs from rivers and coastal erosion in biogeochemical models is therefore important for reliable assessments of ocean acidification, ecosystem health, and carbon budgets in the Arctic Ocean.