Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-67
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-67
23 Feb 2026
 | 23 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

An antiplane strain model for evaluating shear-margin stability (Ortholine v1.0)

Jenny Suckale and Cooper W. Elsworth

Abstract. Shear margins—the lateral boundaries of ice streams and glaciers—play a key role in the mass balance of our ice sheets. In glaciers, shear margins are often controlled by topography, whereas in ice streams they are inherently dynamic and can migrate. Margin migration alters the width of fast-moving ice and thus the force balance that controls ice speed and mass loss. Quantifying whether a shear margin is stable or prone to migration is hence important for estimating the future mass balance, but requires understanding the processes governing its current position. Numerous englacial and subglacial processes may contribute, including shear heating, fabric development, basal topography, lithology, and hydrology. Although the potential importance of these processes has been established, we currently lack models aimed at evaluating their relative importance at a specific field site and we aim to fill this gap. Here, we introduce "Ortholine'', an antiplane-strain free-boundary model developed to evaluate the relative importance of different englacial and subglacial processes in controlling a specific shear-margin location. By focusing on the cross-sectional force balance of ice streams, Ortholine complements commonly used flow-line models. After deriving and verifying Ortholine, we outline the four key steps for applying it to a field site, using Institute Ice Stream in the Weddel Sea Sector, Antarctica, as a proof-of-concept. We have selected Institute Ice Stream as an example, because of its intermediate complexity and the sufficient availability of field data to guide the model setup.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jenny Suckale and Cooper W. Elsworth

Status: open (until 20 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jenny Suckale and Cooper W. Elsworth

Model code and software

Ortholine Cooper W. Elsworth https://github.com/coopere/InstituteIceStream2D

Jenny Suckale and Cooper W. Elsworth
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 23 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
The widths of glaciers and ice streams can change over time, which strongly affects how much ice is lost to the ocean. Many existing models of sea-level rise neglect these width changes, but they are commonly observed and important. This paper presents a new, simple model that helps identify which physical factors govern width changes at different field sites. The model is explained step by step and tested using an Antarctic ice stream as an example.
Share