Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6697
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6697
05 Nov 2026
 | 05 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Exploring the Hydrological Functions and Effectiveness of Nature-based Solutions in Mountain Environments: Evidence, Indicators, and Comparability

Michell Andree Fernández Velarde, Santiago Yepez, Jan Cools, and Jan Staes

Abstract. Mountain regions play a vital role in providing water resources, yet their hydrological systems are under threat from by climate change, land-use change, and socio-economic pressures. Although Nature-based solutions (NbS) are increasingly being considered as a means of ensuring water security, evidence of their hydrological performance in mountain environments is inconsistent and limited. This study presents a critical scoping review of the evidence on the hydrological functions of NbS in mountain regions, examining how reported hydrological effects can inform their contribution to water security objectives. A total of 106 studies were identified and classified into three groups: forest-based interventions, wetlands, and water harvesting. The four most frequently assessed hydrological functions were flow regulation, water retention, groundwater recharge, and soil erosion control. The evidence was unevenly distributed geographically, with studies concentrated in a limited number of countries. Forest-based interventions showed relatively consistent evidence for flow regulation, whereas evidence for groundwater recharge was more variable. Wetland studies reported effects on flow regulation and water retention, but these varied between sites and assessment approaches. Water harvesting interventions, particularly terraces and infiltration trenches, were frequently linked with runoff reduction and soil erosion control. However, their evidence base was predominantly local in scale and less extensive for several hydrological functions. The reported effect ranges varied within the NbS groups, highlighting the context-dependent nature of their performance and limiting the possibility of direct comparisons between cases. Overall, the review identified recurrent hydrological functions and conditioning factors relevant to mountain NbS, while highlighting important gaps in baseline conditions, methodological assessment, and spatial coverage. These findings establish a foundation for improving the assessment of hydrological evidence in mountain regions and for developing frameworks that demonstrate the contribution of NbS to water security.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Michell Andree Fernández Velarde, Santiago Yepez, Jan Cools, and Jan Staes

Status: open (until 17 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Michell Andree Fernández Velarde, Santiago Yepez, Jan Cools, and Jan Staes
Michell Andree Fernández Velarde, Santiago Yepez, Jan Cools, and Jan Staes
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 06 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
Evidence on the hydrological performance of Nature-based Solutions remains inconsistently reported in mountain regions. It has been revealed that reported results vary widely, making them difficult to understand due to insufficient descriptions of local conditions. This limits the ability to compare findings and make informed decisions about their application. We propose a reporting framework for describing the hydrological effects to help planners implement these solutions more reliably.
Share