Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6648
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6648
30 Oct 2026
 | 30 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

State dependence of aerosol forcing and its implications for climate response

Haozhe He, Brian J. Soden, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Ryan J. Kramer, Jianhao Zhang, and Chanyoung Park

Abstract. Aerosols offset greenhouse-gas warming, but their radiative forcing is often treated as a property of the aerosol perturbation, without accounting for the climate state in which it occurs. Here we show that this assumption is incomplete using atmosphere-only simulations with two GFDL atmospheric model configurations, GFDL-AM4.0 and GFDL-AM4-MG2, across climates from 8 K colder to 8 K warmer than present day. In both models, the same present-day-minus-preindustrial aerosol-emission perturbation produces weaker cooling as climate warms. This weakening arises from changes in both aerosol–radiation and aerosol–cloud interactions. Direct aerosol forcing weakens as aerosol optical depth decreases, reflecting changes in aerosol burden and the optical effectiveness of aerosol mass. Aerosol–cloud forcing weakens through model-dependent mechanisms: shortwave liquid-cloud adjustments dominate in GFDL-AM4.0, consistent with reduced cloud susceptibility in warmer climates, whereas GFDL-AM4-MG2 shows an additional longwave pathway involving aerosol–cloud–ice interactions and high-cloud responses. Aerosol forcing also weakens as climate feedbacks become less negative, revealing consistent within-model co-variation of forcing and feedback. These results highlight the importance of accounting for background climate state when interpreting the role of aerosol forcing in historical attribution, climate model tuning, and future climate projections.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Haozhe He, Brian J. Soden, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Ryan J. Kramer, Jianhao Zhang, and Chanyoung Park

Status: open (until 11 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Haozhe He, Brian J. Soden, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Ryan J. Kramer, Jianhao Zhang, and Chanyoung Park
Haozhe He, Brian J. Soden, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Ryan J. Kramer, Jianhao Zhang, and Chanyoung Park

Viewed

Total article views: 37 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
30 5 2 37 2 2
  • HTML: 30
  • PDF: 5
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 37
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Oct 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Oct 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 37 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 37 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 31 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Aerosols, tiny particles in the air, can cool Earth by reflecting sunlight and changing clouds. We used two climate models to test how the same aerosol-emission change affects climates ranging from colder to warmer than today. In both models, aerosol cooling weakened as the climate warmed, although cloud processes differed between models. Aerosol cooling also changed alongside how strongly climate responds to warming. This matters for understanding past warming and future climate.
Share