| 04 Nov 2026
Decadal transit times of flocculated mud in the Yukon River, Alaska are due to transient storage in river deposits
Abstract. Mud particles comprise the vast majority of riverine sediment discharges and mediate the transfer of particulate organic carbon from terrestrial landscapes to deltas. Historically, mud particles were considered washload – sediment that may travel hundreds of kilometers without depositing, implying that rivers are fast paths through which mud-associated organic carbon exits terrestrial landscapes. However, recent studies have found that the interaction of particulate organic carbon and mud particles promotes flocculation, which enhances settling velocities, potentially driving mud and carbon deposition into the riverbed, point bars, and overbank deposits. Here, we study the transport of mud, developing and calibrating a statistical model based on particle hop lengths and transient storage residence times to investigate these processes for the Yukon River Basin, which has a carbon-rich, sub-arctic floodplain. From our field observations, we find that flocculated mud settles at about 2.86 mm s-1 and constitutes about 10 % of the sediment in the active layer of the riverbed, 20 % of the sediment in point bars, and 60 % of the sediment in overbank deposits. Our model shows that 60–80 % of mud particles transit the alluvial reaches of the Yukon River over decades, rather than the few weeks predicted if mud was a passive water tracer. Nearly all (~99.9 %) of the decadal transit time is spent in the active layer of the riverbed, as opposed to the water column. 20–40 % of mud particles enter floodplain storage during alluvial transit, extending their transit time from decades to centuries, or even millennia. Individual riverbed depositional events only last a few days because of rapid water column entrainment, whereas individual floodplain depositional events typically last centuries or longer, highlighting the dynamic nature of the riverbed. Consequently, transient storage in river deposits may allow substantial carbon dioxide and methane generation in rivers.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Earth Surface Dynamics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
