Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6528
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6528
09 Nov 2026
 | 09 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Atmospheric observations reveal Alaskan wetland CH4 fluxes are up to threefold higher than process-based model estimates

Hanyu Liu, Charles E. Miller, Colm Sweeney, Kathryn McKain, Jennifer D. Watts, Róisín Commane, Luke D. Schiferl, Zhen Zhang, Benjamin Poulter, Leyang Feng, Ao Chen, Ziting Huang, Dylan C. Gaeta, Kristan L. Morgan, William S. Daniels, Qiulun Li, Joe R. Melton, Vineet Yadav, Deborah Huntzinger, and Scot M. Miller

Abstract. Amplified Arctic warming could substantially increase methane (CH4) fluxes from high-latitudes by accelerating soil thaw and releasing soil organic carbon into the atmosphere. Yet, the magnitude and spatiotemporal patterns of current and future high-latitude CH4 fluxes remain highly uncertain. We estimate growing season (May to September) CH4 fluxes in Alaska from 2012 to 2017 using atmospheric observations from two NASA campaigns: the Carbon in Arctic Reservoirs Vulnerability Experiment (CARVE) and Arctic-Carbon Atmospheric Profiles (Arctic-CAP). We couple these observations with an atmospheric transport model and a geostatistical inverse model to estimate the geographic distribution, seasonality, and inter-annual variability of CH4 fluxes. As part of this approach, we evaluate how well different state-of-the-art, process-based flux models compare to the inverse estimate of CH4 fluxes. We find that estimated statewide fluxes are a factor of 1.3 to 2.9 higher compared to different ensembles of process-based models. This discrepancy is largest across the North Slope of Alaska – up to a factor of 6.5 when compared to one of the model ensembles. We do not find any statistically significant inter-annual variability (IAV) during years 2012–2017, and the IAV in our estimate is generally consistent with process-based models. In addition, our analysis reveals that differences in inundation fraction mapping contribute to the magnitude discrepancies in current process-based models, and future improvements in inundation maps are essential to reduce uncertainties in CH4 flux estimates across high latitudes. These results provide an improved atmospheric constraint on regional CH4 flux estimates from northern wetlands under accelerated Arctic warming.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Hanyu Liu, Charles E. Miller, Colm Sweeney, Kathryn McKain, Jennifer D. Watts, Róisín Commane, Luke D. Schiferl, Zhen Zhang, Benjamin Poulter, Leyang Feng, Ao Chen, Ziting Huang, Dylan C. Gaeta, Kristan L. Morgan, William S. Daniels, Qiulun Li, Joe R. Melton, Vineet Yadav, Deborah Huntzinger, and Scot M. Miller

Status: open (until 21 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Hanyu Liu, Charles E. Miller, Colm Sweeney, Kathryn McKain, Jennifer D. Watts, Róisín Commane, Luke D. Schiferl, Zhen Zhang, Benjamin Poulter, Leyang Feng, Ao Chen, Ziting Huang, Dylan C. Gaeta, Kristan L. Morgan, William S. Daniels, Qiulun Li, Joe R. Melton, Vineet Yadav, Deborah Huntzinger, and Scot M. Miller
Hanyu Liu, Charles E. Miller, Colm Sweeney, Kathryn McKain, Jennifer D. Watts, Róisín Commane, Luke D. Schiferl, Zhen Zhang, Benjamin Poulter, Leyang Feng, Ao Chen, Ziting Huang, Dylan C. Gaeta, Kristan L. Morgan, William S. Daniels, Qiulun Li, Joe R. Melton, Vineet Yadav, Deborah Huntzinger, and Scot M. Miller
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 09 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
We combine NASA aircraft observations with atmospheric inverse modeling to estimate Alaska’s growing-season methane fluxes for 2012–2015 and 2017. Our statewide estimates are 1.3–2.9 times those of process-based models, with the largest discrepancies on Alaska’s North Slope. We find that differences in wetland inundation fraction maps contribute to these gaps, highlighting the need for improved inundation fraction mapping and atmospheric observations to constrain Arctic methane emissions.
Share