Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6517
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6517
27 Oct 2026
 | 27 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).

A seasonal threshold on El Niño amplitude set by the Pacific zonal temperature gradient

Ioana Colfescu, Edwin Schneider, Massimo Bollasina, Nick Dunstone, Matt Patterson, and Mat Collins

Abstract. El Niño is the largest year-to-year fluctuation of Earth’s climate, and its strongest events disrupt rainfall across much of the planet. Each event weakens the Pacific trade winds, which are maintained by the west–east sea-surface temperature (SST) contrast that El Niño itself erodes. Whether this relationship imposes an upper limit on event amplitude remains unknown. Across three SST reconstructions for 1950–2025, we find that the zonal SST contrast decreases by about 1°C per degree of Niño3.4 warming within each calendar month. Extrapolating this relationship to zero contrast gives a seasonal threshold ranging from +1.8°C in April to +4.3°C in November; no month since 1950 has exceeded its corresponding threshold. Relative to the tropical mean SST, the threshold has changed little since 1870, as strengthening of the climatological gradient and tropical warming nearly offset each other. In historical near-zero-gradient months, the ocean advective terms associated with the Bjerknes feedback reversed, although these cases occurred only during the decay season. Across 57 coupled climate models, a near-zero gradient during September–December is associated with a lower probability of further Niño3.4 growth: 29%, compared with 62% when 1–2°C of gradient remains. In 2026, the gradient reached a record September low while El Niño was still developing. We define prospective observational tests to assess whether the event continues to grow as the gradient approaches zero, providing a direct test of the proposed constraint.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ioana Colfescu, Edwin Schneider, Massimo Bollasina, Nick Dunstone, Matt Patterson, and Mat Collins

Status: open (until 08 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ioana Colfescu, Edwin Schneider, Massimo Bollasina, Nick Dunstone, Matt Patterson, and Mat Collins
Ioana Colfescu, Edwin Schneider, Massimo Bollasina, Nick Dunstone, Matt Patterson, and Mat Collins
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 27 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
El Niño warms the eastern Pacific, and in doing so erodes the east–west temperature contrast that drives it. Since 1870 that contrast has never reversed, and it sets a seasonal ceiling on El Niño: near +2 °C in spring, +4 °C in late autumn. The events that reached it stopped growing that month, and 145 CMIP6 simulations carry the same limit. The record 2026 event is now approaching it, and we fixed the tests in advance.
Share