Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6464
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6464
30 Oct 2026
 | 30 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Climate of the Past (CP).

Evaluating Late Pliocene Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation dynamics through biogeochemical proxy–model comparison

Honbing Edmond Duong, Heather L. Ford, Yong Sun, Julia Tindall, Alan Haywood, Taylor Deneau, Clay Tabor, Ran Feng, Natalie Burls, Sze Ling Ho, Erin L. McClymont, Sarah Greene, Pam Vervoort, Jordan T. Abell, Montserrat Alonso-Garcia, Pallavi Anand, Melissa Berke, Anya Crocker, Friso de Graaf, Stijn De Schepper, Cyrus Karas, Kate Littler, Benjamin Petrick, Amila Sandaruwan Ratnayake, Bjørg Risebrobakken, George E. A. Swann, Christian Stepanek, Deborah Tangunan, Kaustubh Thirumalai, and Antje H. L. Voelker

Abstract. Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is a major feature in the climate system, moving heat and carbon globally. Climate models suggest AMOC’s strength will decrease in the coming decades, with profound implications for regional and global climate patterns. Biogeochemical proxies from benthic foraminifera tests can act as water mass tracers and provide information on deep ocean circulation during past periods of global warmth. The strength of AMOC during the Late Pliocene warm period (∼3.0–3.3 Ma), a pseudo-analogue for future climate change, is poorly constrained, with benthic foraminiferal δ13C showing a spatially expanded North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW), whereas models often simulate a spatially retracted NADW relative to Pre-Industrial. Here we compare δ13C and δ18O proxies in the Atlantic for the warm mid-Piacenzian KM5c interval (3.205 ± 0.02 Ma) with four isotope-enabled climate model simulations allowing for a direct comparison between proxy data and climate models. Proxy data generally show a more expansive NADW with Antarctic Bottom Water limited to the greatest depths. Although climate models resolve key intermediate and deep water masses, differences in spatial patterns between the models are attributed to model parameterisations and boundary conditions. The models and proxy data show different deep ocean structures, which limits our ability to understand deep ocean circulation during the warm mid-Piacenzian KM5c interval and its relevance to future warming scenarios.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Climate of the Past.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Honbing Edmond Duong, Heather L. Ford, Yong Sun, Julia Tindall, Alan Haywood, Taylor Deneau, Clay Tabor, Ran Feng, Natalie Burls, Sze Ling Ho, Erin L. McClymont, Sarah Greene, Pam Vervoort, Jordan T. Abell, Montserrat Alonso-Garcia, Pallavi Anand, Melissa Berke, Anya Crocker, Friso de Graaf, Stijn De Schepper, Cyrus Karas, Kate Littler, Benjamin Petrick, Amila Sandaruwan Ratnayake, Bjørg Risebrobakken, George E. A. Swann, Christian Stepanek, Deborah Tangunan, Kaustubh Thirumalai, and Antje H. L. Voelker

Status: open (until 25 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Honbing Edmond Duong, Heather L. Ford, Yong Sun, Julia Tindall, Alan Haywood, Taylor Deneau, Clay Tabor, Ran Feng, Natalie Burls, Sze Ling Ho, Erin L. McClymont, Sarah Greene, Pam Vervoort, Jordan T. Abell, Montserrat Alonso-Garcia, Pallavi Anand, Melissa Berke, Anya Crocker, Friso de Graaf, Stijn De Schepper, Cyrus Karas, Kate Littler, Benjamin Petrick, Amila Sandaruwan Ratnayake, Bjørg Risebrobakken, George E. A. Swann, Christian Stepanek, Deborah Tangunan, Kaustubh Thirumalai, and Antje H. L. Voelker

Data sets

PlioVAR Benthic Isotopes PlioVAR Group https://github.com/hl-ford/PlioVAR---Climate-Model-Comparison

Late Pliocene Climate Model Output Yong Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23497855

Interactive computing environment

Notebooks to Construct Figures Honbing Edmond Duong https://github.com/hl-ford/PlioVAR---Climate-Model-Comparison

Honbing Edmond Duong, Heather L. Ford, Yong Sun, Julia Tindall, Alan Haywood, Taylor Deneau, Clay Tabor, Ran Feng, Natalie Burls, Sze Ling Ho, Erin L. McClymont, Sarah Greene, Pam Vervoort, Jordan T. Abell, Montserrat Alonso-Garcia, Pallavi Anand, Melissa Berke, Anya Crocker, Friso de Graaf, Stijn De Schepper, Cyrus Karas, Kate Littler, Benjamin Petrick, Amila Sandaruwan Ratnayake, Bjørg Risebrobakken, George E. A. Swann, Christian Stepanek, Deborah Tangunan, Kaustubh Thirumalai, and Antje H. L. Voelker
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 31 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Deep circulation in the Atlantic helps regulate climate by moving heat and carbon around the globe. Using fossil evidence from a warm period 3 million years ago, this study found that North Atlantic Deep Water was more widespread than climate models suggest. Disagreements between the fossil data and climate models highlight uncertainties in the fossil data and climate models and how the deep ocean responds to warming, limiting predictions of future deep ocean changes.
Share