the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Evaluating Late Pliocene Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation dynamics through biogeochemical proxy–model comparison
Abstract. Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is a major feature in the climate system, moving heat and carbon globally. Climate models suggest AMOC’s strength will decrease in the coming decades, with profound implications for regional and global climate patterns. Biogeochemical proxies from benthic foraminifera tests can act as water mass tracers and provide information on deep ocean circulation during past periods of global warmth. The strength of AMOC during the Late Pliocene warm period (∼3.0–3.3 Ma), a pseudo-analogue for future climate change, is poorly constrained, with benthic foraminiferal δ13C showing a spatially expanded North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW), whereas models often simulate a spatially retracted NADW relative to Pre-Industrial. Here we compare δ13C and δ18O proxies in the Atlantic for the warm mid-Piacenzian KM5c interval (3.205 ± 0.02 Ma) with four isotope-enabled climate model simulations allowing for a direct comparison between proxy data and climate models. Proxy data generally show a more expansive NADW with Antarctic Bottom Water limited to the greatest depths. Although climate models resolve key intermediate and deep water masses, differences in spatial patterns between the models are attributed to model parameterisations and boundary conditions. The models and proxy data show different deep ocean structures, which limits our ability to understand deep ocean circulation during the warm mid-Piacenzian KM5c interval and its relevance to future warming scenarios.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Climate of the Past.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(18566 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 25 Dec 2026)
Data sets
PlioVAR Benthic Isotopes PlioVAR Group https://github.com/hl-ford/PlioVAR---Climate-Model-Comparison
Late Pliocene Climate Model Output Yong Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23497855
Interactive computing environment
Notebooks to Construct Figures Honbing Edmond Duong https://github.com/hl-ford/PlioVAR---Climate-Model-Comparison