Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6462
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6462
26 Oct 2026
 | 26 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Similar-Year Feature Construction Improves Deep-Learning Arctic Sea Ice Forecasts

Mingfeng Wang, Jie Su, and Yibin Ren

Abstract. Seasonal Arctic sea ice prediction is important for understanding Arctic climate change and its impacts. Existing deep-learning models commonly use the multi-year mean climatology of the forecast period as a historical-evolution background. This provides stable seasonal information, but has limited ability to represent interannual differences in sea ice evolution. We propose a dynamic similar-year feature construction method based on sea ice spatial similarity and incorporate it into the SwinUNet forecasting framework. Using sea ice concentration (SIC) at forecast initialization and the Intersection over Union (IoU) of sea ice extent (SIE), the method identifies the most similar historical year since 1979 and extracts its SIC evolution over the forecast period as the historical-evolution feature. Continuous SIC and sea ice thickness (SIT) from the preceding four months are also included, combining recent conditions with historical same-period evolution. Using NSIDC SIC and PIOMAS SIT data from 1979 to 2024, four-month Arctic sea ice forecasts are conducted at pentad intervals. The Similarity scheme is compared with Continuous and Climatology features in SwinUNet, as well as Persistence and ECMWF SEAS5. Similarity generally outperforms Continuous and Climatology. Over the first 12 forecast periods, it reduces MAE by 5.41% and 6.97%, improves ACC by 1.63% and 4.03%, and increases BACC by 0.09% and 0.42%, respectively. Relative to Persistence and SEAS5, the annual-mean MAE decreases by 22.19% and 42.24%, while BACC improves by 4.67% and 8.43%. These results show that dynamic similar-year features can enhance SwinUNet skill without increasing model complexity.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Mingfeng Wang, Jie Su, and Yibin Ren

Status: open (until 21 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Mingfeng Wang, Jie Su, and Yibin Ren
Mingfeng Wang, Jie Su, and Yibin Ren
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 27 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Arctic sea ice is shrinking. Seasonal forecasts help plan months ahead. Many models use a long-term ice average, which captures the usual cycle but misses high- or low-ice years. We find the year since 1979 whose ice is most similar at the forecast start, then use that year's ice changes with concentration and thickness from the prior four months. In four-month SwinUNet forecasts (1979–2024), this method beat two common alternatives, persistence, and ECMWF SEAS5, without a more complex model.
Share