Doctoral Task Forces on High Impact Natural Hazard Events
Abstract. Around the globe, disasters are becoming more frequent and more damaging. Therefore, forensic disaster analysis is needed that creates a deep and comprehensive understanding of a recent event and its root causes to inform disaster risk reduction. As part of their qualification within a research training group, PhD candidates at the University of Potsdam formed Task Forces to investigate recent damaging events. Based on eleven semi-structured interviews, two informal interviews and Task Force outputs, this study evaluates past Task Forces with regards to their implementation into structured doctoral training, their contribution to researcher development and to transferring insights both to the academic community and to non-academics. We find that Task Forces in doctoral training programs serve a dual purpose in providing problem-based and experiential learning opportunities for doctoral researchers and at the same time providing the flexible, high-level investigative capacity needed for immediate post-event analysis. For future Task Forces, we recommend forming interdisciplinary teams, aligning the Task Force with the PhD topic and methods and providing targeted support in the initial phase to enable near-real time analysis.
Competing interests: Author Annegret Thieken was one of the interviewees in this study. To ensure the integrity and objectivity of the research, the data analysis and coding were carried out independently by Karen Lebek. Annegret Thieken provided intellectual input and editorial revisions after the primary analysis was completed.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.