Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-640
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-640
05 Feb 2026
 | 05 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Ocean Science (OS).

First global assessment of the Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux (EDMF) parameterization for oceanic convection in NEMO: implications for global temperature and surface heat fluxes

Violaine Piton, Hervé Giordani, Romain Bourdalle-Badie, and Charles Pelletier

Abstract. The Eddy-Diffusivity Mass-Flux (EDMF) parameterization provides a unified framework to represent both local (diffusive) and non-local (convective) vertical mixing in the ocean. While EDMF has been evaluated in idealized and regional configurations, its performance in global ocean models has not yet been assessed. We present the first global-scale evaluation of the EDMF scheme implemented in NEMO and compare it with the widely used Enhanced Vertical Diffusion (EVD) and Mixed Layer Penetration (MLP) parameterizations. Three global 1/4° simulations for 1999–2020 are analyzed, focusing on convective regimes, upper-ocean temperature and mixed-layer depth.

EDMF successfully reproduces both shallow diurnal convection in the tropics and deep wintertime convection in subpolar regions, with modelled plume timing, penetration depth and vertical velocities consistent with available observations. In the tropics, EDMF captures the observed penetrative cooling and depth variability of nocturnal cold plumes, in contrast to the instantaneous adjustment produced by EVD. In deep-convection regions such as the Labrador Sea, EDMF simulates realistic interannual variability in convective depth and intensity.

The improved representation of convective regimes leads to a ~30 % reduction in global upper-ocean (0–700 m) temperature biases in EDMF compared to EVD-based simulations. Changes in latent heat loss, driven by SST differences, dominate the associated changes in net surface heat flux between EDMF and EVD simulations, corresponding to ~6.5 % of the global average net climatological surface heat balance.

These findings demonstrate that EDMF provides a more physically consistent representation of oceanic convection and offers an alternative to traditional and empirical EVD- and MLP- based approaches.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Violaine Piton, Hervé Giordani, Romain Bourdalle-Badie, and Charles Pelletier

Status: open (until 02 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Violaine Piton, Hervé Giordani, Romain Bourdalle-Badie, and Charles Pelletier
Violaine Piton, Hervé Giordani, Romain Bourdalle-Badie, and Charles Pelletier
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 05 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
Vertical ocean mixing regulates climate by transferring heat from the surface to depth. Because most models use simplified schemes, they often misrepresent convection and bias temperatures and air–sea heat exchange. We test a new mixing scheme in a global ocean model. It better captures daily tropical surface mixing and deep winter convection at high latitudes, reduces upper-ocean temperature biases, and alters surface heat balance, improving climate model realism.
Share