Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6383
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6383
09 Nov 2026
 | 09 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).

Representation of North Atlantic Atmospheric Rivers in the IFS and ICON Models: Insights from NAWDIC Dropsonde Observations

Magdalena Kracheletz, Joaquim G. Pinto, David A. Lavers, and Alexandre M. Ramos

Abstract. Atmospheric Rivers (ARs), defined as narrow bands of intense water vapor transport, are a major driver of wintertime heavy precipitation and flood events across Western Europe. Due to the high impacts of ARs, accurate forecasts are crucial, but their initialization and evaluation remains challenging due to a lack of observational data over the oceans. The “North Atlantic Waveguide, Dry Intrusion and Downstream Impact Campaign" (NAWDIC) collected unique dropsonde observations of several strong ARs that caused widespread flooding, disruption and economic damage over the Iberian Peninsula and Northern Africa in January and February 2026.

Using this one-of-a-kind dataset, we performed the first systematic evaluation of the AR representation over the North Atlantic ocean basin in the IFS and the ICON models. Specifically, the vertical structure of temperature, specific humidity, horizontal wind speed, and moisture flux magnitude was analyzed using the model data assimilation outputs. While the overall representation of ARs in the IFS and ICON models is skillfull, results indicate large random errors in the horizontal wind speed estimates and a slight cold bias over North Atlantic AR regions. The IFS exhibits an underestimation and large random errors in the humidity, peaking between 700 and 750 hPa, which corresponds to the upper-level extension of ARs. The ICON model tends to slightly underestimate the humidity throughout the boundary layer and the entire lower troposphere up to 650 hPa. The large random errors in wind speed and the underestimation of humidity in both models lead to an underestimated and highly uncertain moisture flux magnitude in the IFS and ICON models. The results of this study highlight the importance of observational data from AR regions over the North Atlantic and the current model limitations in accurately representing intense ARs affecting Western Europe.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Magdalena Kracheletz, Joaquim G. Pinto, David A. Lavers, and Alexandre M. Ramos

Status: open (until 21 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Magdalena Kracheletz, Joaquim G. Pinto, David A. Lavers, and Alexandre M. Ramos
Magdalena Kracheletz, Joaquim G. Pinto, David A. Lavers, and Alexandre M. Ramos

Viewed

Total article views: 41 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
31 6 4 41 7 7 6
  • HTML: 31
  • PDF: 6
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 41
  • Supplement: 7
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Nov 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Nov 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 41 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 41 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 10 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
We evaluate the representation of North Atlantic Atmospheric Rivers (ARs) in the IFS and ICON models using unique observations from the 2026 NAWDIC campaign. Both models show skill in representing the overall AR structure, but indicate a slight underestimation of temperature, moisture and moisture flux in ARs, as well as large uncertainties in the wind speed estimates. Our results provide insights into model performance and help improve AR forecasts and associated extreme precipitation.
Share