Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6321
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6321
22 Oct 2026
 | 22 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Reviews and syntheses: When does moss act as a methane biofilter? Transport pathways and environmental controls in peatlands

Dong-Gill Kim, Hojeong Kang, Jinhyun Kim, and Gayoung Yoo

Abstract. Peatlands are critical global carbon stores and the largest natural source of atmospheric methane (CH4). Bryophytes, particularly Sphagnum and submerged brown mosses, can act as effective biological CH4 filters by hosting methanotrophs within their hydrated tissues and providing photosynthetically derived oxygen. In diffusion-dominated systems, moss-associated oxidation can consume 61–99% of upward CH4 flux. However, the presence of moss cover alone does not guarantee ecosystem-scale emission reduction. Synthesizing evidence from 122 studies across field observations, mesocosms, and manipulation experiments, we evaluate the moss biofilter as a realized, state-dependent transport-and-oxidation process. We show that biofilter effectiveness emerges from competition among three distinct pathways: diffusion through the living moss layer, vascular-plant bypass via aerenchyma, and episodic ebullition. Only the diffusive fraction is consistently exposed to the moss oxidation zone. This pathway partitioning is shaped by microtopography and successional trajectories and is highly vulnerable to global-change stressors. Hydrology acts as the master regulator: modest water-table drawdown expands the oxic oxidation layer, whereas severe desiccation damages moss structure and microbial habitats. Furthermore, warming and chronic nitrogen enrichment can destabilize moss–methanotroph metabolic coupling and promote graminoid expansion, exacerbating vascular bypass. For peatland management and paludiculture, hydrological rewetting is necessary but insufficient; without rapid re-establishment of a functional moss layer and mitigation of nutrient legacies, rewetted sites can become bypass-dominated CH4 hotspots. Techniques such as topsoil removal and the moss layer transfer technique (MLTT) can accelerate recovery, provided full CO2–CH4 trade-offs are evaluated. Finally, we highlight priorities for Earth system modeling, emphasizing that models must explicitly separate diffusive, vascular, and ebullitive pathways rather than treating moss cover as a static oxidation parameter.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Dong-Gill Kim, Hojeong Kang, Jinhyun Kim, and Gayoung Yoo

Status: open (until 03 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Dong-Gill Kim, Hojeong Kang, Jinhyun Kim, and Gayoung Yoo
Dong-Gill Kim, Hojeong Kang, Jinhyun Kim, and Gayoung Yoo
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 22 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Mosses in peatlands can host microbes that consume methane, a gas that warms the planet. Our review shows that this protection depends on methane reaching the moss and on conditions that keep the microbes active. Gas escaping through plants or bubbles can avoid this natural filter. Moss cover alone therefore cannot predict how much methane is removed. Restoring moss could help, but climate benefits must be assessed across the whole wetland and throughout the year, including all greenhouse gases.
Share