Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-628
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-628
24 Feb 2026
 | 24 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems (GI).

Causal and uncertainty-aware digital-twin framework for ultra–low-noise geoscientific inertial sensors

Antonino D'Alessandro

Abstract. Ultra–low-noise inertial sensors are a cornerstone of modern geoscientific instrumentation, enabling high-resolution observations across seismology, geodesy, gravimetry, and vibration isolation. Achieving and reliably predicting their performance requires a rigorous treatment of physical causality, noise propagation, and uncertainty, particularly in force-feedback architectures operating near fundamental limits. In this study, we introduce a causal and uncertainty-aware digital-twin framework for the design and metrological assessment of ultra–low-noise geoscientific inertial sensors. The proposed framework integrates mechanical dynamics, force-feedback control, transduction, and digital acquisition within a physically realisable model that explicitly enforces causality and stability constraints. Starting from a minimal equation-of-motion description, the digital twin is formulated in the frequency domain to construct causal transfer functions and a comprehensive noise-budget model. The framework enables the systematic separation of fundamental thermal noise limits from implementation-dependent noise sources, including readout, actuation, and digital acquisition effects. We introduce quantitative performance metrics based on self-noise spectra, dominant noise regimes, crossover frequencies, and near-plateau bandwidths, allowing complex spectral behaviour to be condensed into actionable design indicators. Parameter uncertainties are propagated through the digital twin to provide uncertainty-aware performance estimates and robustness diagnostics. Through a series of illustrative analyses, we demonstrate how the proposed digital twin supports informed design trade-offs, identifies performance bottlenecks, and prevents non-physical or overly optimistic sensitivity estimates arising from non-causal modelling assumptions. While focused on inertial sensors, the methodology is general and transferable to other classes of geoscientific instruments. The framework provides a transparent and extensible foundation for next-generation sensor design, virtual experimentation, and metrologically consistent performance prediction.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Antonino D'Alessandro

Status: open (until 01 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Antonino D'Alessandro
Antonino D'Alessandro

Viewed

Total article views: 51 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
36 10 5 51 3 3
  • HTML: 36
  • PDF: 10
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 51
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Feb 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Feb 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 51 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 51 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
Instruments that measure extremely small ground motions are vital for monitoring earthquakes, volcanoes, and slow Earth deformation. This study presents a virtual modelling approach that predicts sensor performance before construction. By accounting for physical limits, electronic effects, and uncertainty, the method clarifies what truly limits sensitivity and how designs can be improved, supporting the development of more accurate and robust tools for Earth science.
Share