Causal and uncertainty-aware digital-twin framework for ultra–low-noise geoscientific inertial sensors
Abstract. Ultra–low-noise inertial sensors are a cornerstone of modern geoscientific instrumentation, enabling high-resolution observations across seismology, geodesy, gravimetry, and vibration isolation. Achieving and reliably predicting their performance requires a rigorous treatment of physical causality, noise propagation, and uncertainty, particularly in force-feedback architectures operating near fundamental limits. In this study, we introduce a causal and uncertainty-aware digital-twin framework for the design and metrological assessment of ultra–low-noise geoscientific inertial sensors. The proposed framework integrates mechanical dynamics, force-feedback control, transduction, and digital acquisition within a physically realisable model that explicitly enforces causality and stability constraints. Starting from a minimal equation-of-motion description, the digital twin is formulated in the frequency domain to construct causal transfer functions and a comprehensive noise-budget model. The framework enables the systematic separation of fundamental thermal noise limits from implementation-dependent noise sources, including readout, actuation, and digital acquisition effects. We introduce quantitative performance metrics based on self-noise spectra, dominant noise regimes, crossover frequencies, and near-plateau bandwidths, allowing complex spectral behaviour to be condensed into actionable design indicators. Parameter uncertainties are propagated through the digital twin to provide uncertainty-aware performance estimates and robustness diagnostics. Through a series of illustrative analyses, we demonstrate how the proposed digital twin supports informed design trade-offs, identifies performance bottlenecks, and prevents non-physical or overly optimistic sensitivity estimates arising from non-causal modelling assumptions. While focused on inertial sensors, the methodology is general and transferable to other classes of geoscientific instruments. The framework provides a transparent and extensible foundation for next-generation sensor design, virtual experimentation, and metrologically consistent performance prediction.
This paper focuses on the core challenges in the design and metrological assessment of ultra-low-noise inertial sensors for geoscientific applications, proposing a causal and uncertainty-aware digital twin framework.However, there is room for optimization in experimental validation, parameter sensitivity analysis, and the expression of certain technical details. It can meet the publication requirements after targeted revisions.
1.The mechanical subsystem in the paper is modeled as a single-degree-of-freedom inertial plant, which can capture the dominant dynamics but fails to clearly state the applicable frequency range and boundary conditions of this simplified model.
2.The paper only verifies the framework's effectiveness through simulation analysis, lacking experimental data support from actual sensor prototypes. It is suggested to supplement experimental validation based on real inertial sensors.
3.The references lack sufficient citations of relevant research in the past 2 years (2024-2025), especially the latest applications of digital twins in the field of inertial sensors and advances in ultra-low-noise readout technology. It is suggested to supplement high-impact literature from the past 2 years to reflect the cutting-edge and timeliness of the research.
4.Excessive steps are omitted in the derivation of some formulas. For example, the conversion steps from the equation of motion (1) to the frequency-domain expression (2) and the derivation logic of the self-noise power spectral density formula (3) are not elaborated. It is suggested to supplement the core derivation steps of key formulas, or cite relevant literature to illustrate the derivation basis, enhancing the rigor of the theoretical part.
5.The performance comparison section only compares with theoretical limits and lacks quantitative comparison with existing similar sensor design methods (such as traditional noise budgeting and simplified digital twin models).