Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-624
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-624
20 Feb 2026
 | 20 Feb 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Diverging runoff drives uncertainty in Antarctic surface mass balance projections under a high emission scenario

Benjamin Heurgue, Charles Amory, Christoph Kittel, Fredrik Boberg, Gaël Durand, Vincent Favier, Xavier Fettweis, Quentin Glaude, Heiko Goelzer, Nicolaj Hansen, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Ruth Mottram, Martin Olesen, Willem Jan Van de Berg, Michiel R. Van den Broeke, and René R. Wijngaard

Abstract. Three recent downscalings of CESM with MAR, RACMO, and HIRHAM under SSP5-8.5 produce consistent contemporary Antarctic surface mass balance (SMB), but diverge strongly by 2100, especially over ice shelves. HIRHAM simulates a large SMB decline driven by strong runoff increases, MAR a moderate decrease, while RACMO maintains near balance. These differences mainly reflect contrasting melt–albedo feedbacks, present-day melt and refreezing levels, and a persistent 1–2 °C temperature offset between MAR and RACMO. CESM shows a decline similar in magnitude to MAR, with high melt partly compensated by extensive refreezing. Over grounded ice, all models project increased SMB from higher snowfall, though runoff still drives their spread. Despite shared boundary conditions and similar contemporary SMB, model behavior diverges, and CESM’s integrated results resemble MAR's despite its coarse resolution. Performance differences in present-day melt suggest that uncertainty estimates should account for model skill, motivating Bayesian treatment of multi-model ensembles.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of The Cryosphere.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Benjamin Heurgue, Charles Amory, Christoph Kittel, Fredrik Boberg, Gaël Durand, Vincent Favier, Xavier Fettweis, Quentin Glaude, Heiko Goelzer, Nicolaj Hansen, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Ruth Mottram, Martin Olesen, Willem Jan Van de Berg, Michiel R. Van den Broeke, and René R. Wijngaard

Status: open (until 03 Apr 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Benjamin Heurgue, Charles Amory, Christoph Kittel, Fredrik Boberg, Gaël Durand, Vincent Favier, Xavier Fettweis, Quentin Glaude, Heiko Goelzer, Nicolaj Hansen, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Ruth Mottram, Martin Olesen, Willem Jan Van de Berg, Michiel R. Van den Broeke, and René R. Wijngaard
Benjamin Heurgue, Charles Amory, Christoph Kittel, Fredrik Boberg, Gaël Durand, Vincent Favier, Xavier Fettweis, Quentin Glaude, Heiko Goelzer, Nicolaj Hansen, Nicolas C. Jourdain, Ruth Mottram, Martin Olesen, Willem Jan Van de Berg, Michiel R. Van den Broeke, and René R. Wijngaard
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 20 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
We studied how the Antarctic ice sheet surface mass balance may change by 2100 using three high-resolution climate models forced by the same future climate scenario. While the models agree for present-day conditions, they project very different futures, especially over floating ice shelves. These differences mainly come from how melting, refreezing, and temperature are represented. Our results show that future sea level projections strongly depend on how well models simulate today’s climate.
Share