Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6224
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6224
04 Nov 2026
 | 04 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Quality Consistency Assessment among MODIS, MERSI, and VIIRS Cloud Mask Products using China’s Space-borne Lidar ACDL

Sijie Chen, Bo Li, Xi Wang, Zhaojun Zheng, Lin Chen, and Jian Liu

Abstract. Cloud masking is the fundamental step in accurately retrieving cloud and many other properties from satellite-based imagers. Intercomparisons among imagers are frequently conducted to assess the agreement of cloud masks at both global and granule scales, ensuring accuracy while also enabling the merging of multi-satellite products for use in NWP models and climate datasets. However, common challenges arise in scenarios with reduced spectral contrast between clouds and backgrounds, leading to generally degraded performance at polar regions and making validation through intercomparison less reliable. Building on previous synergistic observations between CALIOP and MODIS in the A-Train constellation, this study employed China's Aerosol and Carbon Detection Lidar (ACDL) as a new benchmark to evaluate cloud masks from 3 passive sensors across different operational stages. Analyzing approximately 3 million collocated samples in February and August 2024, the overall hit rates for confident cloudy/clear pixels from Aqua/MODIS, FY-3D/MERSI-II, and NOAA-21/VIIRS reached 82.9 %, 79.3 %, and 86.4 %, respectively. Detailed examinations of monthly, day/night, and latitudinal subsets revealed variation in each sensor's performance across scenarios and identified the reasons behind the discrepancies. The study highlighted the importance of active-passive validation, which confirms consistency among passive imagers while also identifying algorithmic weaknesses that need improvement for future missions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sijie Chen, Bo Li, Xi Wang, Zhaojun Zheng, Lin Chen, and Jian Liu

Status: open (until 09 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sijie Chen, Bo Li, Xi Wang, Zhaojun Zheng, Lin Chen, and Jian Liu
Sijie Chen, Bo Li, Xi Wang, Zhaojun Zheng, Lin Chen, and Jian Liu
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
Correctly identifying cloud pixels is essential but difficult under certain conditions, which also makes validation through intercomparison unreliable. We used a new space-borne lidar as a reference and compared it with 3 satellite imagers to find that they correctly identified pixels in 82.9%, 79.3%, and 86.4% of cases, and the performance varied across scenarios. We examined the findings and also compared them with previous studies to identify specific weaknesses to address in future missions.
Share