Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6196
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6196
22 Oct 2026
 | 22 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Uncovering which elements drive timber and soybean traceability models

Wander Labaere, Sebastian Jimenez, Bogdan Buliga, Casper C. C. Chater, Luiz Antônio Martinelli, Willem Waegeman, and Victor Deklerck

Abstract. Independent verification of commodity origin is increasingly needed to support deforestation-free and legality-based supply-chain regulation. Multi-element chemical fingerprints are a promising tool for this purpose as plant and wood chemistry integrates information about soil conditions, which carries a spatially distinct signal. However, machine-learning provenance models are often difficult to scrutinize and interpret. The goal of this work is to evaluate whether elemental fingerprints can predict geographic harvest location and produce interpretable and environmentally plausible evidence for commodity tracing. Its novelty lies in combining continuous coordinate prediction with multiple explainable-machine-learning tools to compare predictive performance, robust feature importance, local explanations and reduced element panels across both soybean and timber. The source data comprised 398 soybean (Glycine max) samples from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil and Paraguay, and 1253 East-European and West-Asian timber samples from Betula, Fagus, Pinus and Quercus. We trained Random Forest, XGBoost and support-vector regression models to predict longitude and latitude and evaluated the models with a Haversine skill score (HSS) relative to a centroid baseline. Feature importance was assessed with permutation importance, conditional permutation importance, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values and cumulative feature-addition analyses. Soybean models achieved the strongest coordinate-prediction performance (mean HSS 0.596–0.628), while timber genera showed lower but consistently positive skill scores. Attribution analyses identified relatively small-element suites: soybean predictions were driven mainly by Co, Ba, Cu, Mg, Ni, Se, Ca and Cs. Timber markers were genus-specific, with Sr, Pb and Fe being ranked the highest for Betula; Cl, Fe and Bi for Fagus; Rb, Br and Zn for Pinus; and Fe, Sr and Ni for Quercus. The results show that explainable machine learning can provide a more transparent and auditable basis for elemental-based commodity-origin prediction.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Wander Labaere, Sebastian Jimenez, Bogdan Buliga, Casper C. C. Chater, Luiz Antônio Martinelli, Willem Waegeman, and Victor Deklerck

Status: open (until 03 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Wander Labaere, Sebastian Jimenez, Bogdan Buliga, Casper C. C. Chater, Luiz Antônio Martinelli, Willem Waegeman, and Victor Deklerck

Model code and software

Analysis code - Labaere et al. Wander Labaere, Sebastian Jimenez https://github.com/WanderLabaere/commodity-tracing-interpretability

Wander Labaere, Sebastian Jimenez, Bogdan Buliga, Casper C. C. Chater, Luiz Antônio Martinelli, Willem Waegeman, and Victor Deklerck
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 22 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Wood and soybeans absorb a chemical fingerprint from the soil they grow in, offering a way to verify the harvest location of traded products. We measured multi elements in 400 LATAM soybean samples and 1,200 Eurasian birch, beech, pine and oak samples, then trained machine learning models to predict where each grew. Soybeans were traced best, mainly via Co, Ba, Mg and Cu, while each tree type relied on its own elements. A few elements did most of the work, making checks cheaper and clearer.
Share