Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6158
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6158
23 Oct 2026
 | 23 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Soil thermal buffering across environmental gradients is not uniform

Giuseppe Nicolosi and Christian Mulder

Abstract. Large-scale ecological studies typically rely on gridded air temperature, although this may poorly represent the thermal conditions experienced by belowground organisms. Recent soil-temperature products make it possible to examine soil–air temperature differences over broad spatial scales, but it remains unclear whether soils buffer atmospheric heat and cold in the same way, and how these patterns vary among environments. We quantified soil–air thermal buffering across a continental soil-biodiversity network using ERA5-Land, treating warm and cold extremes separately. We compared these patterns with a SoilTemp–CHELSA representation and tested whether regional differences were related to broad climate, measured topsoil properties, and landscape composition. Cold extremes were buffered in 165 of 168 ERA5-Land cells (98.2 %), with a median soil–air offset of +2.14 °C. In contrast, only 41.1 % of cells buffered warm extremes, while 58.9 % showed heat amplification, with a median offset of −0.26 °C. Heat buffering also varied strongly among pedoclimatic regions. Mediterranean South (MDS) cells showed the greatest amplification, with a mean Heat offset of −4.41 °C and no positive buffering among the 16 cells. This regional contrast persisted after accounting for broad thermal climate and landscape composition. Measured topsoil properties showed little robust association with ERA5-Land buffering after correction for multiple testing. Cross-product agreement was much stronger for Cold than for Heat. The stronger edaphic associations obtained with SoilTemp–CHELSA were also retained after aggregation to ERA5-Land spatial support, indicating that the contrast between products was not explained by spatial resolution alone. Overall, soil thermal buffering was strongly asymmetric: soils generally moderated atmospheric cold, but not necessarily heat, and in some regions amplified warm extremes. Air temperature alone may therefore mischaracterize the thermal conditions experienced belowground.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Giuseppe Nicolosi and Christian Mulder

Status: open (until 04 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Giuseppe Nicolosi and Christian Mulder
Giuseppe Nicolosi and Christian Mulder
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 23 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Soils share the highest biodiversity on Earth and drive ecosystem functioning. However, mostly only air temperature is modelled, although soil organisms are likely to suffer local microclimate. Large-scale studies typically rely on gridded air temperature, although this may not affect soil organisms. We quantified air-soil thermal differences as related to climate, soil, or landscape. Overall, buffering was asymmetric: soils moderated atmospheric cold and in some regions amplified warm extremes
Share