Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6027
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6027
06 Nov 2026
 | 06 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Measurement report: Radiocarbon reveals contrasting size distributions of black carbon from fossil fuels and biomass burning in Guangzhou, China

Nannan Wei, Buqing Xu, Sanyuan Zhu, Lingxiao Lu, Jing Li, Fan Jiang, Junwen Liu, Zhineng Cheng, Shizhen Zhao, Kechang Li, Jun Li, and Gan Zhang

Abstract. The size of atmospheric black carbon (BC) is a key determinant of its health and climate impacts. However, how BC sources vary with particle size remains poorly understood. We conducted radiocarbon (14C)-based source apportionment of atmospheric BC in Guangzhou, China, across six discrete particle-size fractions from < 0.49 μm to 7.2–10 μm during winter and summer. The dataset comprises 81 Δ14C measurements, resolving fossil-fuel and biomass-burning contributions across particle sizes. Additional δ13C measurements of four representative winter sample sets were incorporated into a Bayesian model to apportion fossil-derived BC between coal and petroleum sources. Fossil sources dominated BC, contributing 91 ± 3 % in winter and 73 ± 1 % in summer. In both seasons, the fossil contribution first increased and then decreased with increasing particle size, peaking in the 0.95–1.5 μm fraction (95 % in winter and 88 % in summer) and declining to its lowest level in the 7.2–10 μm fraction (82 % in winter and 50 % in summer). Coal and petroleum made comparable contributions to BC in the selected winter samples, with no consistent particle-size-dependent trends. Thus, the particle-size dependence of BC sources was driven mainly by an increasing biomass-burning contribution toward the coarse fraction, rather than by a systematic shift in the relative contributions of coal and petroleum. These findings show that bulk source fractions do not fully capture the source composition of BC across particle sizes, underscoring the need to account for source-specific size distributions when interpreting BC transport, removal, and associated climate and health effects.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Nannan Wei, Buqing Xu, Sanyuan Zhu, Lingxiao Lu, Jing Li, Fan Jiang, Junwen Liu, Zhineng Cheng, Shizhen Zhao, Kechang Li, Jun Li, and Gan Zhang

Status: open (until 18 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Nannan Wei, Buqing Xu, Sanyuan Zhu, Lingxiao Lu, Jing Li, Fan Jiang, Junwen Liu, Zhineng Cheng, Shizhen Zhao, Kechang Li, Jun Li, and Gan Zhang

Data sets

Measurement report: Radiocarbon-based source apportionment of size-resolved black carbon aerosols in Guangzhou, South China B. Xu https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23239332

Nannan Wei, Buqing Xu, Sanyuan Zhu, Lingxiao Lu, Jing Li, Fan Jiang, Junwen Liu, Zhineng Cheng, Shizhen Zhao, Kechang Li, Jun Li, and Gan Zhang
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 06 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
Atmospheric black carbon affects climate and health, but its sources can vary with particle size and remain difficult to determine. We measured radiocarbon to identify black carbon sources across particle sizes in Guangzhou, China, in winter and summer. Fossil fuels dominated, especially in smaller particles, while biomass burning contributed a larger share in larger particles. These results highlight the importance of particle size in assessing black carbon sources and atmospheric impacts.
Share