Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5990
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5990
13 Oct 2026
 | 13 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Assessment of the PACE/SPEXone Aerosol Layer Height (ALH) Retrievals and Intercomparison with EarthCARE/ATLID Observations

Kalliopi Artemis Voudouri, Andreas Karipis, Alexandra Tsekeri, Otto Hasekamp, Kirk Knobelspiesse, Meng Gao, Santiago Gasso, Gerd-jan van Zadelhoff, Athanasios Tsikerdekis, Guangliang Fu, Anton Lopatin, Oleg Dubovik, Edward Malina, Eleni Marinou, and Vassilis Amiridis

Abstract. Here, we present the first evaluation of the PACE/SPEXone aerosol layer height (ALH) products over oceanic regions, assessing retrievals from the two independent algorithms and their products, RemoTAP and FastMAPOL, against aerosol layer heights derived from EarthCARE/ATLID. The ATLID aerosol layer heights are calculated using a center-of-mass (COM) approach applied to aerosol extinction profiles. The selected oceanic regions provide insight on the PACE/SPEXone ALH retrieval performance, highlighting its sensitivity to the aerosol optical depth (AOD) loading and the aerosol vertical structure. Better agreement is observed over the Mediterranean region, where dust and mixed-dust aerosol types dominate. The RemoTAP and FastMAPOL retrievals show correlation coefficients of R = 0.30 and R = 0.60, with corresponding mean absolute errors of 1.12 and 1.07 km, respectively. Conversely, weaker correlations are found over the South Atlantic and Indian Ocean regions. Overall, global statistics indicate moderate agreement between SPEXone and ATLID ALH products, showing the dependence on the aerosol vertical distribution. We conclude that improved consistency is found for cases with strong agreement between SPEXone and EarthCARE AOD retrievals, particularly under higher aerosol loading conditions (AOD > 0.1). We further examine the impact of different ALH definitions by applying alternative Gaussian-fit approaches to the ATLID profiles, which leads to a slight improvement in the agreement between active and passive ALH estimates.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Kalliopi Artemis Voudouri, Andreas Karipis, Alexandra Tsekeri, Otto Hasekamp, Kirk Knobelspiesse, Meng Gao, Santiago Gasso, Gerd-jan van Zadelhoff, Athanasios Tsikerdekis, Guangliang Fu, Anton Lopatin, Oleg Dubovik, Edward Malina, Eleni Marinou, and Vassilis Amiridis

Status: open (until 18 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Kalliopi Artemis Voudouri, Andreas Karipis, Alexandra Tsekeri, Otto Hasekamp, Kirk Knobelspiesse, Meng Gao, Santiago Gasso, Gerd-jan van Zadelhoff, Athanasios Tsikerdekis, Guangliang Fu, Anton Lopatin, Oleg Dubovik, Edward Malina, Eleni Marinou, and Vassilis Amiridis
Kalliopi Artemis Voudouri, Andreas Karipis, Alexandra Tsekeri, Otto Hasekamp, Kirk Knobelspiesse, Meng Gao, Santiago Gasso, Gerd-jan van Zadelhoff, Athanasios Tsikerdekis, Guangliang Fu, Anton Lopatin, Oleg Dubovik, Edward Malina, Eleni Marinou, and Vassilis Amiridis
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 13 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates two satellite-based methods for retrieving aerosol layer height using observations from the PACE and EarthCARE missions. We assess the consistency of their retrievals under different atmospheric conditions and across diverse regions, identifying when they agree best and highlighting the strengths and limitations of each approach. The results support the validation of these missions, which are expected to provide long-term observations for reliable climate data records.
Share