Hyperlocal air quality monitoring and source apportionment of non-refractory PM2.5 at three urban sites using stationary van-based measurements: A Lucknow case study
Abstract. The present study addresses a key gap in characterizing hyperlocal air quality across three contrasting land-use settings during the peak pollution season in a central city in the Indo-Gangetic Plain (CIGP). We conducted ~744 hours of hyperlocal measurements in Lucknow city, spanning the post-monsoon to winter season over 31 days, using a mobile ambient air quality monitoring platform (MAAQMP). Measurements were conducted at three contrasting land-use settings—a background Site (“Site 1”), a traffic corridor (“Site 2”), and a major industrial cluster (“Site 3”). High-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS) organic and inorganic mass spectra were subjected to Multilinear Engine-2, Positive Matrix Factorization (ME-2 PMF) source apportionment using a unified organic-inorganic aerosol (OA–IA) matrix. Across sites, NR-PM2.5 was dominated by secondary organic aerosols (SOA), with biomass burning, traffic, and inorganic-associated organic factors (sulphate, nitrate-rich OA). Unlike Sites 1–2 (sulphate/low-volatility oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA)-dominant), Site 3 showed heterogeneous OA from biomass burning, semi-volatile/nitrate OOA, solid fuel, and traffic. Particle growth events (PGEs) were predominantly nocturnal, occurring under stable boundary-layer and inversion conditions. Site 3 exhibited ~5 times more nocturnal PGEs than the background, which was attributed to a higher condensation sink (CS). Stack vapors drive these PGEs (5–15 nm/h), enhancing the growth of oxidized biomass-burning organic aerosols (O-BBOA) and low-volatility OOA under inversions (r = 0.24). These results highlight the potential of near-source stationary van-based measurements for resolving hyperlocal aerosol growth processes and source influences.
The manuscript attempts to investigate organic aerosol sources, secondary formation, and particle growth processes using AMS and SMPS measurements across multiple sites in an urban setting. While the topic is relevant, the study suffers from serious conceptual, methodological, and presentation flaws that substantially limit its scientific credibility and contribution. The manuscript requires substantial rethinking of its objectives, analytical framework, and data interpretation, rather than incremental revision.
Specific comments: