Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5941
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5941
19 Oct 2026
 | 19 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Climate of the Past (CP).

After Krakatau: Eurasian Climate and Circulation in Historical Temperature and Pressure Records

Anna V. Shapiro and Ulrich Foelsche

Abstract. The impact of the Krakatau eruption on Eurasian climate is still not fully understood. Previous studies have provided insight from seasonal averages and gridded datasets, while the month-to-month evolution and the role of atmospheric circulation remain less clearly resolved. Here, we analyse air-temperature and station-pressure observations from the Annalen des Physikalischen Centralobservatoriums at monthly and daily resolution. The first complete post-eruption year, 1884, was characterised by marked seasonal variability rather than continuous cooling. Mild conditions in January and February were followed by widespread negative temperature anomalies through much of spring and summer, with particularly coherent cooling in April and August. Network-median anomalies in these months were −1.50 °C and −1.91 °C, respectively, both ranking as the coldest among the corresponding reference years. Conditions reversed during autumn, culminating in widespread December warmth, with a network-median anomaly of +2.71 °C, the warmest in the reference-year distribution. Late-summer cooling recurred in August 1885, whereas December warmth was common across much of Eurasia from 1883 to 1886. Simultaneous pressure observations point to a substantial role for atmospheric circulation in the winter anomalies, while the spring and late-summer cooling was not associated with a common pressure pattern. Daily records show that cool conditions could persist for weeks despite changing local pressure differences. The observations therefore indicate strong regional modulation of the post-Krakatau temperature evolution; an additional volcanic influence remains physically plausible but cannot be isolated from the historical station data.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Anna V. Shapiro and Ulrich Foelsche

Status: open (until 14 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Anna V. Shapiro and Ulrich Foelsche
Anna V. Shapiro and Ulrich Foelsche
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 20 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
We examined historical temperature and air-pressure measurements from across Eurasia to see how conditions changed after the 1883 Krakatau eruption. The first full year after the eruption was not simply colder: spring and late summer were unusually cool, while winter was often mild or warm. Pressure patterns also changed strongly, showing that regional atmospheric circulation played an important role in shaping the observed temperature changes.
Share