Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5897
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5897
19 Oct 2026
 | 19 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Conditional Design Flood Hydrograph Derivation Considering Spatially Heterogeneous Rainfall and Nonlinear Nonstationary Routing

Jing Feng, Jiacheng Duan, Jianzhu Li, Hongdong Song, Bin Wang, Xu Chen, and Hao Wang

Abstract. Design flood hydrographs are jointly influenced by the spatial distribution of rainfall, antecedent wetness states, and catchment runoff generation and routing responses. Taking the XDY Basin as the study area, this study develops a conditional design flood hydrograph derivation framework that accounts for spatially heterogeneous rainfall and nonlinear nonstationary routing. Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis (ERRA) is used to identify rainfall-runoff responses under different antecedent wetness states, net rainfall intensities, and spatial subregions, based on which state-dependent unit hydrographs are constructed. Joint frequency analysis of 96 h total rainfall depth (P96) and maximum 1 h rainfall intensity, together with a common representative rainfall pattern and spatial-response correction, is then used to derive design flood hydrographs under lower (L) and higher (H) antecedent wetness states. For a given return period, the L and H scenarios use the same design rainfall input. The results show that higher antecedent wetness and greater net rainfall intensity produce stronger runoff responses and earlier flood peaks. In the incremental model-structure comparison, the mean Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) increased from 0.744 to 0.874. Compared with the L scenario, the H scenario increased peak discharge by 54.4 %–100.0 %, advanced the time to peak by 19–27 h, and increased flood volume by 26.6 %–59.9 %. Event-level paired Bootstrap analysis indicates that statistical uncertainty is concentrated mainly around the rising limb and main flood peak, while the effects of antecedent wetness exhibit good sample stability. The proposed framework provides process-based information for design flood review, flood-control safety assessment, and flood risk analysis.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jing Feng, Jiacheng Duan, Jianzhu Li, Hongdong Song, Bin Wang, Xu Chen, and Hao Wang

Status: open (until 30 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jing Feng, Jiacheng Duan, Jianzhu Li, Hongdong Song, Bin Wang, Xu Chen, and Hao Wang
Jing Feng, Jiacheng Duan, Jianzhu Li, Hongdong Song, Bin Wang, Xu Chen, and Hao Wang
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 19 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Flood planning needs realistic views of how floods develop, but flood size and timing depend on where rain falls and how wet the ground is beforehand. We developed a method using past rainfall and flood data to capture both effects. With the same rainfall, wetter starting conditions produced floods that were 54.4–100.0 % larger at their peak, reached the peak 19–27 hours earlier, and carried 26.6–59.9 % more water. This approach can improve reservoir safety checks and flood risk planning.
Share