Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5876
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5876
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
22 Oct 2026
| 22 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscience Communication (GC).
We <3 Skynet: Or, How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bot Responses in Our Survey Data
Abstract. A case study in methods reveals a way that false responses to online surveys can be leveraged to add rhetorical value to technical communication research. Serendipitously, we discovered during our study of community commonplaces of weather-forecast discussions that open-ended bot responses contained phrases very close to rhetorical commonplaces generated by humans. Using freely available text-mining tools, technical communication researchers can easily mine false responses for indicators of community beliefs, norms, and values. This LESSONS Report (Limitations, Errors, Surprises, Shortcomings, Opportunities for New Science) exemplifies a surprising situation that could introduce limitations or errors (if unaddressed) but instead is converted to an opportunity to increase the robustness of survey data.
How to cite. Olman, L., Hatchett, B. J., Collins, M., Heggli, A., Lambrecht, K., Tolby, Z., and Charles, D.: We <3 Skynet: Or, How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bot Responses in Our Survey Data, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5876, 2026.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Download & links
Download & links
- Preprint
(576 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 17 Dec 2026)
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
Viewed
Total article views: 265 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 Oct 2026)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 175 | 71 | 19 | 265 | 28 | 26 |
- HTML: 175
- PDF: 71
- XML: 19
- Total: 265
- BibTeX: 28
- EndNote: 26
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 265 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 265 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Latest update: 11 Nov 2026
Lynda Olman
University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, USA
Benjamin J. Hatchett
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Colorado State University, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Meghan Collins
Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, USA
Anne Heggli
Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, USA
Kathryn Lambrecht
Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ, USA
Zach Tolby
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Global Systems Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Dominic Charles
Cognizant Technology Solutions, Teaneck, NJ, USA
Short summary
Online surveys are valuable data sources supporting social science research. However, they are increasingly susceptible to false responses from both bots that may be difficult to discern from humans. Using free tools, we report a simple method to leverage these false responses to extract indicators of weather-related community beliefs, norms, and values. This situation could introduce errors (if unaddressed) but instead we use it as an opportunity to increase the robustness of survey data.
Online surveys are valuable data sources supporting social science research. However, they are...