Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5805
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5805
09 Nov 2026
 | 09 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Solid Earth (SE).

Rethinking Earthquakes

Satoshi Ide

Abstract. Earthquake science has progressed through major paradigm shifts regarding how we measure and conceptualize the size and physics of earthquakes. While seismology prior to the 1950s viewed earthquakes as dynamic, wave-dominated processes quantified by radiated energy, the establishment of plate tectonics in the 1960s shifted the focus entirely to macroscopic fault motions measured by the seismic moment. This fault-centric view, combined with laboratory-derived rate- and state-dependent friction (RSF) laws, fostered an optimism during the late 20th century that the entire earthquake process—including deterministic nucleation and precursors—could be comprehensively explained by continuum mechanics. However, the 21st-century discovery of slow earthquakes has fundamentally challenged this unified picture. This review rethinks the governing physics of both fast and slow earthquakes by contrasting their dynamic behaviours. Slow earthquakes, characterized by a linear moment–duration scaling, scale-dependent migration velocities, and Brownian fluctuations, are fundamentally governed by diffusion processes rather than the wave equation. Conversely, fast earthquakes represent a scale-free, stochastic cascade-up process on hierarchical fault structures. Decades of high-resolution observations indicate that macroscopic, deterministic nucleation phases are practically negligible, and that the earthquake growth process is well-approximated by a single, universal moment growth curve. Within this framework, the Gutenberg–Richter law can be reinterpreted not merely as a regional statistic, but as the conditional probability of a cascading rupture continuing or terminating, which is modulated by local environmental conditions such as stress and fault geometry. Ultimately, shifting our perspective to this stochastic, dual-mode nature of fault motion—powered by modern dense networks, Artificial Intelligence, and high-performance computing—provides a new foundation to unlock the remaining mysteries of fault mechanics and earthquake predictability in the coming decades.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Satoshi Ide

Status: open (until 21 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Satoshi Ide
Satoshi Ide

Viewed

Total article views: 91 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
70 16 5 91 9 7
  • HTML: 70
  • PDF: 16
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 91
  • BibTeX: 9
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Nov 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Nov 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 91 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 91 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 10 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
While fault-centric models assumed earthquake processes could be deterministically modeled using a friction law, the discovery of "slow earthquakes" in this century challenged this unified view. This review contrasts slow earthquakes, driven by scale-limited diffusion processes, with fast earthquakes, which grow through random, cascading-up ruptures. Our findings suggest that deterministic nucleation phases are negligible, and that rupture growth depends on environmental probabilities.
Share