Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5784
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5784
22 Oct 2026
 | 22 Oct 2026

Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal under Overshoot Conditions: A Multi-Model Assessment of Efficiency and Carbon Cycle Responses

Anusha Sathyanadh, Jörg Schwinger, Tommi Bergman, Antti-Ilari Partanen, Timothée Bourgeois, Miriam Seifert, Judith Hauck, David Keller, Tronje Kemena, Claudia Eisenring, Phil Renforth, Spyros Foteinis, and Helene Muri

Abstract. To limit global warming to well below 2°C, global CO2 emissions must reach net zero, implying that carbon dioxide removal (CDR) will be needed to compensate for residual emissions. Additional CDR will potentially be required in overshoot pathways that reduce global temperature after a peak in the second half of this century. Here, we explore the efficiency of two marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) methods, Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) and Direct Ocean Carbon Removal (DOCR), and the carbon cycle response to their deployment in the coupled Earth system. We model the additional deployment of mCDR during 2040–2099 in an overshoot pathway that originally assumes only terrestrial CDR (SSP5-3.4-OS), using four emission-driven Earth System Models (ESMs). Our coastal OAE deployment is based on a life cycle assessment (LCA) of ocean liming, while DOCR is implemented targeting a similar carbon removal as OAE. We define mCDR efficiency as moles CO2 taken up by the ocean per mole alkalinity added (moles DIC removed for DOCR). These metrics shows a substantial model spread when averaged globally over the last decade of our simulations: 0.53–0.69 for OAE and 0.66–0.94 for DOCR. These values reflect uncertainties in ocean circulation, mixing, and carbonate system biases in ESMs. Our simulations confirm that a significant part of the additional air-sea CO2-flux is located outside the deployment regions, but we find a substantial model uncertainty also for this metric. Our models indicate that on average 42–57% of the additional CO2 uptake for OAE and 49-65% for DOCR happens inside the coastal deployment regions. The reduction of atmospheric CO2 levels compared to the SSP5-3.4-OS baseline varies across models, with a multi-model mean reduction of 7.6 ± 1.6 ppm for OAE and 6.5 ± 1.6 ppm for DOCR in the last decade of our simulations. This corresponds to a modest cooling of 0.07 ± 0.04 °C (OAE) and 0.04 ± 0.04 °C (DOCR) relative to the baseline, with no significant influence on the timing of overshoot recovery. The temperature as well as the land-carbon responses are found to be small and mostly not statistically robust relative to the (modelled) internal variability of the climate system. Overall, our multi-model assessment suggests that OAE and DOCR can contribute to long-term atmospheric CO2 reduction, but inter-model differences still need to be better understood and reduced to improve estimates of marine CDR efficiency.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Anusha Sathyanadh, Jörg Schwinger, Tommi Bergman, Antti-Ilari Partanen, Timothée Bourgeois, Miriam Seifert, Judith Hauck, David Keller, Tronje Kemena, Claudia Eisenring, Phil Renforth, Spyros Foteinis, and Helene Muri

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Anusha Sathyanadh, Jörg Schwinger, Tommi Bergman, Antti-Ilari Partanen, Timothée Bourgeois, Miriam Seifert, Judith Hauck, David Keller, Tronje Kemena, Claudia Eisenring, Phil Renforth, Spyros Foteinis, and Helene Muri
Anusha Sathyanadh, Jörg Schwinger, Tommi Bergman, Antti-Ilari Partanen, Timothée Bourgeois, Miriam Seifert, Judith Hauck, David Keller, Tronje Kemena, Claudia Eisenring, Phil Renforth, Spyros Foteinis, and Helene Muri
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 22 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
We used four global Earth system models to test two ocean-based carbon removal methods along the coasts of the United States, Europe, and China. Both methods reduced atmospheric CO2, but their efficiency varied greatly between models, and much of the carbon removal occurred far from where it was deployed. Cooling emerged only slowly, and remained small, suggesting these methods could support long – term carbon removal but would contribute little to near-term temperature recovery.
Share