Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5762
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5762
09 Oct 2026
 | 09 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

Near-tree soil footprints show higher organic carbon and lower bulk density with no detectable end-of-summer moisture penalty

Ana Paula Ferreira de Brito, Mark Farrell, and Luke Mosley

Abstract. Scattered trees can create fine-scale surface soil enrichment, but it is unclear how far these patterns extend through the mineral soil profile, translate into carbon stocks, and influence moisture content. We quantified the soil functional footprint of 14 established trees from four contrasting cohorts in an arboretum–grassland system under a Mediterranean climate in South Australia. Soil was sampled at 1, 2, 4 and 8 m from each stem at depth intervals to 30 cm. Directly measured surface bulk density was lower at 1, 2 and 4 m than at 8 m, while soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration was 30% higher at 1 m and declined by 8% with each doubling of distance. Total nitrogen, nitrate-N and Colwell-extractable P also varied with distance, whereas gravimetric moisture did not decline towards the trees under the end-of-summer conditions sampled. Distance × tree cohort interactions were not significant for these principal responses. After accounting for depth and tree identity, distance explained 3% of joint soil property variation whereas depth explained 39%. On an equivalent-soil-mass basis, SOC stock at 1 m distance from the tree exceeded that at 8 m by 16.5 Mg C ha⁻¹, although the categorical fixed-depth 0–30 cm SOC-stock test was not significant. Within the radially-weighted 0-8 m footprint, we combined two carbon pools, model-assisted mineral-soil SOC and current projected whole-tree carbon. Together these amounted to 67.4–123.2 Mg C ha⁻¹, with mineral-soil SOC accounting for 59–89% of this combined soil tree total. These results identify a shared, property-specific radial soil footprint characterised by lower bulk density and higher carbon and nutrient concentrations without a detectable dry-season moisture penalty. They also demonstrate why depth resolution, soil mass correction and radial area weighting are essential when converting near-tree enrichment into spatially explicit carbon accounting and monitoring. Because the near-tree zone retained higher carbon and nutrients without an end-of-summer moisture penalty, established trees may support understorey forage production and its resilience under increasing aridity rather than imposing a dry-season water cost.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ana Paula Ferreira de Brito, Mark Farrell, and Luke Mosley

Status: open (until 20 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ana Paula Ferreira de Brito, Mark Farrell, and Luke Mosley
Ana Paula Ferreira de Brito, Mark Farrell, and Luke Mosley
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 09 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Scattered trees can reshape the soil around them, but it is unclear how far this reaches or whether it dries the soil. We measured soil at several distances and depths around fourteen trees in a grassland. Close to the trees, the soil held more carbon and nutrients and was less compact, yet was no drier at the end of summer. This shows that individual trees can enrich soil and store carbon without a water cost, supporting their use in land management under a changing climate.
Share