Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5757
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5757
01 Oct 2026
 | 01 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Observation-based constraint suggests larger ocean carbon uptake and stronger climate feedbacks

Jens Terhaar, Laurent Bopp, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thomas Frölicher, Helene Hollitzer, Tatiana Ilyina, Lester Kwiatkowski, Paul Lerner, Hongmei Li, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, and Aaron Wienkers

Abstract. By absorbing large amounts of anthropogenic carbon from the atmosphere, the ocean strongly buffers the magnitude of warming caused by CO2 emissions. This ocean carbon uptake is often conceptually separated into two components, quantified by the feedback parameters β and γ: The uptake of anthropogenic CO2 driven by rising atmospheric concentration (β), and the effect of climate warming (γ), which reduces this anthropogenic uptake and drives a loss of natural carbon already stored in the ocean. Together, β and γ determine how effectively the ocean absorbs CO2 emissions and shape how much emitted carbon remains in the atmosphere. Thus, β and γ directly affect how much the climate system warms in response to emitted carbon, i.e., the transient climate response to cumulative CO2 emissions (TCRE). However, estimates of ocean β and γ from Earth system models differ widely, leading to substantial uncertainty in the TCRE.

Here, we extend and apply a previously identified emergent constraint linking ocean anthropogenic carbon uptake to observable indicators of the formation of Southern Ocean mode and intermediate waters, North Atlantic deep water formation, and the global surface ocean chemical uptake capacity. In addition to these three predictors, we add an additional indicator for bottom water formation via open-ocean deep convection, defined as the volume of waters below 3000 m that is ventilated via extremely deep mixed layer depths. Using observations of these four indicators, the constrained β is 0.96±0.05 Pg C ppm−1 at doubling of atmospheric CO2 and 0.85±0.04 Pg C ppm−1 at quadrupling of atmospheric CO2. The observationally constrained β is around 4-5% larger and around 35-47% less uncertain than previously estimated. This larger ocean β is further supported by simulated historical anthropogenic carbon uptake in most models being lower than observation-based estimates,
although uncertainties in the latter remain too large to directly constrain β.

Beyond constraining ocean β, we show that ocean β and γ become increasingly correlated over time. This relationship emerges because models with higher anthropogenic carbon uptake, and hence larger β, also show a stronger suppression of that uptake in response to climate change. The stronger suppression is driven by a larger reduction in the indicators for ocean carbon uptake identified above in models with higher indicators at the beginning of the simulations, e.g., a model with stronger ventilation at present will also see a stronger reduction of that ventilation in the future. As atmospheric CO2 increases, the climate-driven reduction in anthropogenic carbon uptake increasingly dominates over the climate-driven loss of natural carbon, causing γ to become primarily controlled by reductions in anthropogenic carbon uptake over time. As a result, the same observable indicators that constrain ocean β also constrain ocean γ at high CO2. At doubling of atmospheric CO2, this yields a constrained ocean γ of -10.1±2.4 Pg C ◦C−1, which is 23% larger in magnitude but has the same uncertainty as
the unconstrained multi-model mean. Reflecting the strengthening of this relationship with increasing atmospheric CO2, the constraint tightens further at quadrupling of CO2 to -24.5±3.6 Pg C °C−1, which is 28% larger and 42% less uncertain.

Overall, we have extended a previous constraint for the ocean carbon uptake by (1) adding an additional parameter that removed a known bias from unrealistic open-ocean deep convection, (2) transferring the constraint to γ and providing a mechanistical explanation for that constraint and evidence for that mechanism, (3) applying the constraint regionally, (4) identifying substantial biases in β and γ and reducing uncertainties, and (5) improving process understanding of drivers of changes in the ocean carbon sink. Although both the increase in atmospheric CO2 uptake and the increase in carbon loss with climate change were biased across the model ensembles and could be constrained, the bias corrections of β and γ offset each other, leaving the best estimate of the ocean carbon sink relatively unchanged (2–3% increase compared to this ensemble mean). However, the uncertainties of β and γ are reduced and hence is the overall uncertainty of the carbon sink, which will propagate into smaller uncertainties of important climate metrics such as the TCRE.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jens Terhaar, Laurent Bopp, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thomas Frölicher, Helene Hollitzer, Tatiana Ilyina, Lester Kwiatkowski, Paul Lerner, Hongmei Li, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, and Aaron Wienkers

Status: open (until 12 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jens Terhaar, Laurent Bopp, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thomas Frölicher, Helene Hollitzer, Tatiana Ilyina, Lester Kwiatkowski, Paul Lerner, Hongmei Li, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, and Aaron Wienkers
Jens Terhaar, Laurent Bopp, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thomas Frölicher, Helene Hollitzer, Tatiana Ilyina, Lester Kwiatkowski, Paul Lerner, Hongmei Li, Anastasia Romanou, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, and Aaron Wienkers
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
The ocean absorbs about 30% of CO2 emissions, but how much it will keep absorbing as CO2 levels rise and the climate warms is highly uncertain. Combining climate models with observations, we show models underestimate both the ocean CO2 uptake with increasing atmospheric CO2 and how strongly this uptake weakens with warming, and that the two are linked. Our tighter estimate reduces uncertainty in how much emitted CO2 stays in the atmosphere, and in the warming caused by future emissions.
Share