Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5685
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5685
11 Nov 2026
 | 11 Nov 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Beyond stomata: Interspecific heterogeneity and structural controls of urban ozone deposition

Wen Dong, Xingbao Wang, Kai Xu, Hanxing Zhou, Yincheng Huang, Zhi Lou, Yue Zhang, Zhenyang Huang, Jing Zhang, Junjiong Shao, Yuanyuan Du, Xiaoai Jin, Jian Chen, and Yuan Ren

Abstract. Urban environments are critical ozone (O3) hotspots where intense precursor emissions and high population densities escalate human exposure risks. Current deposition models typically rely on coarse land-use classifications, failing to capture the species-level heterogeneity at the city scale. We quantified O3 dry deposition across 20 common tree species in a subtropical megacity using a modified micrometeorological gradient method to derive species-resolved resistance parameters. Field measurements identified substantial interspecific variation: daytime canopy concentration gradients peaked at 10.02 ± 0.86 ppb (Platanus acerifolia). While standardized stomatal conductance correlates with the inverted minimum stomatal resistance (1/Rs, min, R2 = 0.36, P < 0.001), this relationship provides partial physiological support for the inferred resistance parameters. Sensitivity analysis showed that model-estimated deposition velocity was most sensitive to LAI, followed by wind speed and roughness length. Notably, a 20 % LAI increase reduced estimated deposition velocity by 17.55 % under the prescribed sensitivity experiments. These findings highlight species-level differences in O3 deposition and the coupled roles of canopy structure, aerodynamic transport, and physiological regulation. The resulting resistance estimates provide observational constraints for species-resolved parameterization in atmospheric deposition models, although their transferability requires further validation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Wen Dong, Xingbao Wang, Kai Xu, Hanxing Zhou, Yincheng Huang, Zhi Lou, Yue Zhang, Zhenyang Huang, Jing Zhang, Junjiong Shao, Yuanyuan Du, Xiaoai Jin, Jian Chen, and Yuan Ren

Status: open (until 23 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Wen Dong, Xingbao Wang, Kai Xu, Hanxing Zhou, Yincheng Huang, Zhi Lou, Yue Zhang, Zhenyang Huang, Jing Zhang, Junjiong Shao, Yuanyuan Du, Xiaoai Jin, Jian Chen, and Yuan Ren
Wen Dong, Xingbao Wang, Kai Xu, Hanxing Zhou, Yincheng Huang, Zhi Lou, Yue Zhang, Zhenyang Huang, Jing Zhang, Junjiong Shao, Yuanyuan Du, Xiaoai Jin, Jian Chen, and Yuan Ren
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 11 Nov 2026
Download
Short summary
Urban trees can clean ozone pollution, but air-quality models often treat all trees alike. We measured ozone removal by 20 common tree species in Hangzhou, China. Removal varied greatly among species. Canopy structure and airflow mattered more: denser canopies reduced ozone delivery to leaves. A 20 % rise in leaf area cut removal speed by ~18 %. Our species-specific values improve air-quality forecasts and guide greener, healthier cities.
Share