the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Design and evaluation of a catalytic stripper with a plate electrical aerosol classifier
Abstract. The catalytic stripper (CS) for removing volatile particles is a critical unit within the measurement system. However, the penetration efficiency of small size particles is currently significantly lower than large particles in CS. Therefore, further improving the penetration efficiency of small size particles is of significant research interest. This study aims to enhance the penetration efficiency of small size particles by reducing the thermophoretic loss. For this purpose, a CS equipped with a plate-type electrical aerosol classifier (EAC) was designed and developed, and its performance was evaluated. The particles are prevented from depositing on the tube wall by applying an electric field force to them in the opposite direction to the thermophoretic force they are subjected to, which ultimately serves the purpose of further improving the particle penetration efficiency. The experimental results demonstrated that the CS achieved a removal efficiency (RE) higher than 99.9 % at a flow rate of 1.5 L/min or lower. At a sample flow of 0.3 L/min and a temperature of 350 °C, the penetration efficiency of CS+EAC without voltage was evaluated. Combined with the CS+EAC voltage-penetration efficiency curve, applying -112 V on the EAC, the penetration efficiency was further improved under the same experimental conditions, and the smaller the particle size, the greater the improvement. Compared to the 0 V, the improvement rate for 15 nm at -112 V was 24.4 %, while that for 23 nm was 18.9 %. Further experimental results show that the EAC can remove particles smaller than 10 or 23 nm by further increasing the voltage. This capability enables rapid particle classification and facilitates high temporal resolution measurements of particle number concentrations across different size intervals.
- Preprint
(1635 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(808 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-565', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Mar 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-565', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Apr 2026
This manuscript presents a study on how to improve the penetration efficiency of small solid particles through a catalytic stripper by integrating a plate-type electrical aerosol classifier to counteract thermophoretic losses. The experimental setup is detailed and the data are comprehensive; however, I have serious concerns regarding the design of the instrument. Comments below need to be addressed before a second round of review:
Major comments:
- If the primary goal is to reduce thermophoretic losses, why were simpler design approaches not considered? For instance, adding a concentric tube at the CS outlet to supply a sheath flow around the sample flow could keep particles away from the wall and reduce the thermophoretic loss. Have the authors explored or compared such methods? If not, a justification for favoring the active electric-field approach is needed.
- It is unclear how the instrument is used when measuring real motor emitted particles. Is an X-ray neutralizer installed upstream the instrument so that the EAC can function? If so, it must be noted that the charging efficiency of small particles (10 nm, 23 nm) are very low. In this case, the EAC does not exert electric forces to the neutral particles and only contribute to their losses.
- For particles of one polarity, the applied electric field force opposes the thermophoretic force, thereby reducing wall deposition. However, for particles of the opposite polarity, the electric field force aligns with the thermophoretic force, potentially increasing particle losses. This polarity-dependent effect should be explicitly acknowledged and discussed in the manuscript
- Based on the results shown in Figure 9, it is not evident that the CS+EAC+particle counter combination can reliably determine the peak particle size of a polydisperse aerosol. In particular, the scatter plot in Figure 9a shows a relatively constant slope region in the middle, making it difficult to identify the voltage at which the particle number concentration declines most rapidly. To improve clarity, I suggest color-coding the scatter plot markers by applied voltage and also plot the derivatives of particle number concnentration.
Minor comments:
- Line 383: ‘is gradually removed’ -> ‘gradually moves’
- Page 7: the numbers in Psi 1,2,3 should be in subscript
- Figure 7b: ‘volatility range’?
- Figure 8: the numbers can be put on the color bars for the 15 nm data.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-565-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 135 | 55 | 21 | 211 | 39 | 15 | 15 |
- HTML: 135
- PDF: 55
- XML: 21
- Total: 211
- Supplement: 39
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This study utilizes a combined CS+EAC design, aiming to further improve the penetration efficiency of particles by applying an electric field force counteracting the thermophoretic force they experience after CS treatment. The manuscript articulates the feasibility of this method through structural design and theoretical analysis, and demonstrates its effectiveness through experimental design and data analysis. This is a valuable and innovative contribution to aerosol measurement techniques.
However, there are the following issues that need to be clarified: