Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5617
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5617
08 Oct 2026
 | 08 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Viability of mixed-phase cloud thinning with prognostic mineral dust in CESM2

Paul Farron, Ulrike Lohmann, and Diego Villanueva

Abstract. Mixed-phase cloud thinning (MCT) has been proposed as a regional climate intervention method to offset Arctic warming by reducing the longwave cloud radiative effect of high-latitude winter clouds. While initial studies suggested that MCT could achieve meaningful Arctic cooling using idealized MCT scenarios with prescribed ice-nucleating particle (INP) concentrations, the radiative impact of a more realistic, prognostic seeding aerosol has remained largely unexplored so far. Here we evaluate the viability of MCT using prognostic mineral dust in a global climate model. We conducted a set of 16 sensitivity experiments in the Arctic during the boreal winter (Nov–Feb), varying the dust injection altitude and the seeding rate relative to a control simulation. Mineral dust seeding triggers glaciation of mixed-phase regime clouds, producing a net negative top-of-atmosphere radiative effect, that strengthens with seeding rate, driven by a competition between a positive longwave effect arising from aerosol-radiation interactions (LW ARI), a negative shortwave effect arising from aerosol-radiation interactions (SW ARI), and effects from aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI). Lower seeding altitudes retain more of the seeded dust within the target region and activate a larger fraction of it into cloud droplets, yet produce weaker cloud glaciation and thinning than high-altitude injections. Overall, these results indicate that MCT can produce a meaningful negative top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing over the target region, consistent with the surface-cooling potential suggested by earlier studies, but that both injection altitude and rate influence its efficacy and its side effects.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Paul Farron, Ulrike Lohmann, and Diego Villanueva

Status: open (until 19 Nov 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Paul Farron, Ulrike Lohmann, and Diego Villanueva

Data sets

Data and scripts for "Viability of mixed-phase cloud thinning with prognostic mineral dust in CESM2" Paul Farron, Ulrike Lohamnn, Diego Villanueva https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23206722

Paul Farron, Ulrike Lohmann, and Diego Villanueva
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 08 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Injecting aerosols into Arctic winter clouds has been proposed as a method to cool the region by thinning clouds that would otherwise trap heat. Using a global climate model, we simulated mineral dust aerosols released at different heights and rates to test this idea. Dust triggers ice formation, thinning clouds and cooling the surface, with stronger cooling at higher rates. However, both the release height and amount affect the method's efficacy and side effects.
Share